Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Average- how to quickly calculate

Expert replies
by rishijhawar » Tue Jul 19, 2011 7:27 am
Just thought to check if there is any efficient way to calculate average of a set of non-consecutive numbers (say 993, 994, 996, 997, 998, 1001, 1001, 1002, 1004 and 1004).
[spoiler]Ans: 999[/spoiler]
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by hagan » Tue Jul 19, 2011 3:55 pm
my eye is on this post, am waiting for response from our experts
i want to know it all i am ready to learn it all
Join the discussion

by goalevan » Tue Jul 19, 2011 5:35 pm
Yes, there is actually a very easy way. When you take the mean of a set of numbers, the "residuals" will add to zero.

For example: the average of 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 is 9, and:

7 - 9 = -2
8 - 9 = -1
9 - 9 = 0
10 - 9 = 1
11 - 9 = 2

(-2) + (-1) + 0 + 1 + 2 = 0

This property allows you to start with a "base" number and calculate the residuals from that number to determine where the mean is.

From your example, we can find the average by taking a base number, say 1000, and calculating the sum of the residuals:

993 - 1000 = -7
994 - 1000 = -6
996 - 1000 = -4
997 - 1000 = -3
998 - 1000 = -2
1001 - 1000 = 1
1001 - 1000 = 1
1002 - 1000 = 2
1004 - 1000 = 4
1004 - 1000 = 4

The sum of these numbers is (-7) + (-6) + (-4) + (-3) + (-2) + 1 + 1 + 2 + 4 + 4 = -10

1000 is thus not the mean, but you know that the mean -10/10 lower than 1,000 (since there are 10 numbers that make up the average). The average is 1000 - 1 = 999. This is MUCH easier than trying to sum the numbers and divide.

Another quick example. The average of 650, 662, 668, and 676. Let's take 660 as a base:

650 - 660 = -10
662 - 660 = 2
668 - 660 = 8
676 - 660 = 16

Sum of residuals: 16
Number of observations: 4
+16/4 = 4

The average is thus 660 + 4 = 664.
Join the discussion

by blaster » Tue Jul 19, 2011 8:55 pm
Join the discussion