Australia

Expert replies

umaa: Legendary Member; Posts: 727; Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2008 9:32 pmFollowed by: 1 member; Thanked: 8 times

by umaa » Fri Jul 03, 2009 8:11 pm

In the minds of many people living in England, before Australia was Australia, it was the antipodes, the opposite pole to civilization, an obscure and unimaginable place that was considered the end of the world.

(A) before Australia was Australia, it was the antipodes
(B) before there was Australia, it was the antipodes
(C) it was the antipodes that was Australia
(D) Australia was what was the antipodes
(E) Australia was what had been known as the antipodes

[spoiler]OA A. But IT after the phrase BEFORE AUSTRALIA WAS AUSTRALIA, Doesn't it point out the antecedent ENGLAND? Please let me know.[/spoiler]

Like this post

Source: Beat The GMAT — Sentence Correction | Fri Jul 03, 2009 8:11 pm

kanha81: Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts; Posts: 431; Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 9:32 amFollowed by: 1 member; Thanked: 16 times

Re: Australia

by kanha81 » Sat Jul 04, 2009 10:26 pm

umaa wrote:In the minds of many people living in England, before Australia was Australia, it was the antipodes, the opposite pole to civilization, an obscure and unimaginable place that was considered the end of the world.

(A) before Australia was Australia, it was the antipodes
(B) before there was Australia, it was the antipodes
(C) it was the antipodes that was Australia
(D) Australia was what was the antipodes
(E) Australia was what had been known as the antipodes

[spoiler]OA A. But IT after the phrase BEFORE AUSTRALIA WAS AUSTRALIA, Doesn't it point out the antecedent ENGLAND? Please let me know.[/spoiler]

This is indeed a tricky and twisted sentence. Anyways, IMO it points to the immediate antecedent, hence it refers to Australia.

Want to Beat GMAT.
Always do what you're afraid to do. Whoooop GMAT

Like this post

akhpad: Legendary Member; Posts: 809; Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:10 pmFollowed by: 4 members; Thanked: 50 times

by akhpad » Sun Jul 04, 2010 5:39 am

I am not clear that why pronoun IT is acceptable in A but not in B.

I believe that in A, IT is the subject of the verb and also Australia is the subject of the verb. But same thing does not exist in B. So, this is fine. I am not sure.

OE: In B, it has no logical referent, because the previous clause describes a time when there was no Australia. But I believe that same thing is for A.

Like this post

loveusonu: Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts; Posts: 278; Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2009 1:17 pm; Location: Bangalore,India; Thanked: 17 times

by loveusonu » Sun Jul 04, 2010 6:42 am

umaa wrote:In the minds of many people living in England, before Australia was Australia, it was the antipodes, the opposite pole to civilization, an obscure and unimaginable place that was considered the end of the world.

(A) before Australia was Australia, it was the antipodes
(B) before there was Australia, it was the antipodes
(C) it was the antipodes that was Australia
(D) Australia was what was the antipodes
(E) Australia was what had been known as the antipodes

[spoiler]OA A. But IT after the phrase BEFORE AUSTRALIA WAS AUSTRALIA, Doesn't it point out the antecedent ENGLAND? Please let me know.[/spoiler]

Umaa,
England is not at all a subject and hence 'IT' can't point to England. We have 2 subjects in 2 clauses.
'minds of people', which is plural and Australia, Hence IT correctly points to Australia in A.

in B, The main error is meaning, B means before even Australia Exist, while Author is trying to indicate when Australia was known as Australia..

Hope that helps.

Sonu
--------
When you want something desperately, the whole Universe conspires in helping to give it to you - The Alchemist

Like this post

22: Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts; Posts: 12; Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 9:37 am

by 22 » Sun Jul 04, 2010 6:54 am

(A) before Australia was Australia, it was the antipodes-> (Correct Use of "It"; Here"it" refers to nearest antecedent Aust.
(B) before there was Australia, it was the antipodes-> meaning is changed in this option
(C) it was the antipodes that was Australia-> here it refers to England. Wrong construction
(D) Australia was what was the antipodes -> Wrong construction
(E) Australia was what had been known as the antipodes-> Wrong tense + Bad sentence structure
Go with A..

Like this post

Post new topic Locked

• Page 1 of 1

GMAT Course Reviews

560 reviews

1168 reviews

431 reviews

359 reviews

147 reviews

5/5

5 Star (560 Reviews)

"Target Test Prep is the closest to the official version of the GMAT exam, about 99% accuracy in terms of the quality and quantity of information. The course has excellently created singular sets of focused lessons and tests for every possible topic that one could come across in the official GMAT exam."

"The TTP course maximizes the efficiency of the time you spend studying. It will take time and effort but I could almost guarantee that if you complete the course exactly as it is laid out you will get an amazing score. They also have a very responsive team willing to help with any questions you might have."

"TTP has two things that I think no other test prep company offers: A teaching approach that reinforces understanding and an attitude that will give you the mental preparedness needed to succeed on the test. TTP gives you a deep understanding of the concept you need to know while teaching you how to think."

Write a Review