BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

At the beginning of the year, the city allocated $150

Expert replies
by simplyjat » Sun May 04, 2008 9:43 pm
At the beginning of the year, the city allocated $150 million to cover the increase in wages that it expected to approve as a result of negotiations with the municipal labor unions.

(A) increase in wages that it expected to approve as a result of negotiations
(B) increased wages it expected to approve from negotiations
(C) increasing wages expected to be approved as a result of negotiating
(D) negotiated increases in wages it expected to approve
(E) increases expected to be approved in wages from negotiating

OA A
simplyjat
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

simplyjat wrote:At the beginning of the year, the city allocated $150 million to cover the increase in wages that it expected to approve as a result of negotiations with the municipal labor unions.

(A) increase in wages that it expected to approve as a result of negotiations
(B) increased wages it expected to approve from negotiations
(C) increasing wages expected to be approved as a result of negotiating
(D) negotiated increases in wages it expected to approve
(E) increases expected to be approved in wages from negotiating

OA A
some criteria for elimination:

* the meaning of the original is that the city expected to approve, and thus needed to cover, an increase in wages. in particular, you should not shift the meaning to say that they needed to cover the wages themselves.
this observation eliminates choices b (increased wages) and c (increasing wages).

* the sentence makes it clear that the negotiations hadn't yet happened, but choice d means that they had already occurred (you can't have 'negotiated increases in wages' unless the negotiations have already taken place). so d is gone.

* choice e, quite apart from being ridiculously awkward (to a native speaker, at least), has the following faults:
- it just says that the increases were 'expected to be approved', but doesn't say by whom they were expected to be approved. (the original makes it clear that the city held those expectations)
- 'approved in wages' is at best awkward, and at worst implies that there is some way for an approval to be given financially via wages.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Join the discussion

by Magellan » Thu May 08, 2008 1:40 am
In choice (A), the pronoun 'it' refers to city but it looks like it refers to increase. Isn't that a problem or the sentence is clear enough so that there is no ambiguity?

Thanks
Join the discussion

by lunarpower » Thu May 08, 2008 3:21 am
Magellan wrote:In choice (A), the pronoun 'it' refers to city but it looks like it refers to increase. Isn't that a problem or the sentence is clear enough so that there is no ambiguity?

Thanks
there is no ambiguity; the increase is the object of the verb approve, so it can't simultaneously be the subject of that verb.

compare: jim didn't recognize the man he saw.
explain to yourself why 'man' is not a possible referent for 'he'. same idea here.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Join the discussion

by ting.han » Sun Jul 24, 2011 8:55 am
Great explaination Ron! Thanks.
Join the discussion

by navami » Sun Jul 24, 2011 10:31 pm
Thanks Ron
This time no looking back!!!
Navami
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1