BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 559 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

assumption

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 298
Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2010 1:09 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 2 times
by Deepthi Subbu » Sat Sep 17, 2011 10:08 pm
Doubling the cost of public transportation to compensate for money lost by declining ridership
would be disastrous. The greater expense would only further discourage commuters who are
already dissatisfied with the poor condition of buses and trains. If the fares are increased,
many commuters will choose to drive their cars instead, causing pollution and traffic congestion.
As a result, the city will lose money and become even more noisy and smog-filled than it is now.
Which of the following is an assumption made in advancing the argument above?

(A) Commuters who decide to drive instead of using public transportation will not share
rides with one another.

(B) Commuters will not park their cars in garages and thereby spend more money
than they would by using buses or trains.

(C) The condition of public transportation will not improve as a result of the fare
increase.

(D) Commuters who use their own cars currently outnumber those who use buses
and trains.

(E) A significant number of people who now use public transportation have cars or can
easily obtain them.


OA to follow
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 142
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2011 8:03 am
Thanked: 19 times

by krishnasty » Sat Sep 17, 2011 10:17 pm
I'll go with E.
Reason: The main concern is that public transport commuters would quit and drive in their cars WHICH would result in the city loosing money and pollution level increasing. It's an assumption that every1 who uses public transport has a car.
---------------------------------------
Appreciation in thanks please!!
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1239
Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2011 6:25 amFollowed by: 26 members
Thanked: 233 times
GMAT Score:680

by sam2304 » Sat Sep 17, 2011 10:23 pm
IMO C.

The greater expense would only further discourage commuters who are already dissatisfied with the poor condition of buses and trains. -> Already the public transport condition is bad.

If the fares are increased, many commuters will choose to drive their cars instead, causing pollution and traffic congestion. -> People assume that condition will not improve so switch to cars.
Getting defeated is just a temporary notion, giving it up is what makes it permanent.
https://gmatandbeyond.blogspot.in/
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 93
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2011 10:30 amFollowed by: 2 members
Thanked: 1 times

by ColumbiaVC » Sat Sep 17, 2011 10:38 pm
E
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 139
Joined: Sat May 01, 2010 11:06 pm
Thanked: 4 times
GMAT Score:710

by badpoem » Sat Sep 17, 2011 10:40 pm
Between A and E, I will go with E. E seems to be a very basic assumption.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1239
Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2011 6:25 amFollowed by: 26 members
Thanked: 233 times
GMAT Score:680

by sam2304 » Sat Sep 17, 2011 10:57 pm
Isn't E already stated in the passage ?

If the fares are increased, many commuters will choose to drive their cars instead, causing pollution and traffic congestion. -> already stated they have cars. No need to assume that i suppose. Correct me if i am wrong.
Getting defeated is just a temporary notion, giving it up is what makes it permanent.
https://gmatandbeyond.blogspot.in/
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 496
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2011 5:34 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 38 times

by sl750 » Sun Sep 18, 2011 12:45 am
Conclusion

As a result the city will lose more money and become even more smog filled

Only E addresses this. If commuters didn't own cars nor could access them easily, they would be forced
to use public transport thereby invalidating the conclusion

C is talking about the condition of public transport. How is that relevant in deciding whether the city will lose money or that the city traffic will become more congested?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 298
Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2010 1:09 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 2 times

by Deepthi Subbu » Mon Sep 19, 2011 3:13 am
OA E
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 540
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 7:24 pmFollowed by: 6 members
Thanked: 37 times

by navami » Mon Sep 19, 2011 11:50 am
IMO E
This time no looking back!!!
Navami
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1