David is a 26 years old, very successful entrepreneur and he argues that money and time invested in acquiring a degree in management administration are totally wasted. As evidence supporting his view, he recounts the story of his brother who, at considerable expense of money and time, completed his MBA at a top tier business school and then married an heiress and abandoned a promising career to stay at home and care for their children.
David makes the unsupported assumption that:
A) What was unacceptable to the previous generation has no hope of being embraced today.
B) Marriage wiht children can not be as fulfilling as life long bachelorhood.
C) Professional success is a function of the quality of one's formal education.
D) An education in management administration is useful only in pursuing career related activities.
E) A MBA lost its prestige and wight it once carried in the world of business.
[spoiler]OA D. Why not E ??!!! Where is any hint? if I negate D: "An education in management administration is not useful in pursuing career related activities", the argument and the conclusion do not break or change ??[/spoiler]
David makes the unsupported assumption that:
A) What was unacceptable to the previous generation has no hope of being embraced today.
B) Marriage wiht children can not be as fulfilling as life long bachelorhood.
C) Professional success is a function of the quality of one's formal education.
D) An education in management administration is useful only in pursuing career related activities.
E) A MBA lost its prestige and wight it once carried in the world of business.
[spoiler]OA D. Why not E ??!!! Where is any hint? if I negate D: "An education in management administration is not useful in pursuing career related activities", the argument and the conclusion do not break or change ??[/spoiler]
