Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 563 reviewsTarget Test Prep

assumption

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Subscribe topic
Previous Topic Next Topic
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 115
Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2008 2:18 amFollowed by: 1 member
Location: india
Thanked: 3 times
by geet » Tue Jun 23, 2009 1:00 am
19. Professor Robinson: A large meteorite impact crater in a certain region was thought to be the clue to explaining the mass extinction of plant and animal species that occurred at the end of the Mesozoic era. However, the crystalline structure of rocks recovered at the site indicates that the impact that formed this crater was not the culprit. When molten rocks crystallize, they display the polarity of Earth’s magnetic field at that time. But the recrystallized rocks recovered at the site display normal magnetic polarity, even though Earth’s magnetic field was reversed at the time of the mass extinction.

Each of the following is an assumption on which Professor Robinson’s argument depends EXCEPT:

(A) The crater indicates an impact of more than sufficient size to have caused the mass extinction.

(B) The recovered rocks recrystallized shortly after they melted.

(C) No other event caused the rocks to melt after the impact formed the crater.

(D) The recovered rocks melted as a result of the impact that formed the crater.

(E) The mass extinction would have occurred soon after the impact that supposedly caused it.

OA is A
plz do explain
Top
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 27
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 7:41 pm
Thanked: 2 times

by sasen » Tue Jun 23, 2009 4:43 am
(A) The crater indicates an impact of more than sufficient size to have caused the mass extinction.
If size is not sufficient,it still doesnot break the argument.its how the rocks melted,their timing,their polarity etc which matters not the size.
(B) The recovered rocks recrystallized shortly after they melted.
If the rocks didnot melt immediately,professor's argument that the reverse polarity etc. would be meaningless
(C) No other event caused the rocks to melt after the impact formed the crater.
If some other event would have caused the melting,it might have affected the timing of the cooling and hence the polarity argument would again be menaingless
(D) The recovered rocks melted as a result of the impact that formed the crater.
if the rocks melted because of some other event,the polarity theory by professor would not hold correct since we are again not sure about the timing when the rocks melted and cooled and hence the polarity.
(E) The mass extinction would have occurred soon after the impact that supposedly caused it.
Though the professor rejects the claim that extinction happened because of the impact,if it had happened due to the impact,exitinction should have happened soon or else his whole argument is deemed invalid.
Top
Join the discussion
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 385
Joined: Sun May 24, 2009 3:55 pm
Thanked: 11 times
GMAT Score:740

by Domnu » Tue Jun 23, 2009 6:12 am
I don't understand why the answer isn't E... nothing is mentioned about how 'soon' anything has to happen.
Have you wondered how you could have found such a treasure? -T
Top
Join the discussion
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 27
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 7:41 pm
Thanked: 2 times

by sasen » Tue Jun 23, 2009 6:45 am
i know that option E is very close but there is a very subtle difference between E and A.
look at it this way: suppose that the extinction took place a century after the aforesaid time.Do u think the nutty professor would ever have bothered to make his claim.....no right? because then it brings the whole issue out of context. Asssumption E provides meaning to the professor's conclusion that "impact didnot result in the extinction"..go it or still have confusion?
Top
Join the discussion
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 385
Joined: Sun May 24, 2009 3:55 pm
Thanked: 11 times
GMAT Score:740

by Domnu » Tue Jun 23, 2009 7:10 am
That clears it up. Thanks :)
Have you wondered how you could have found such a treasure? -T
Top
Join the discussion
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 57
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2014 3:07 am

by micheal_kr » Sun May 15, 2016 11:24 pm
I believe the answer should be A
Top
Join the discussion