BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

assumption

Expert replies
by geet » Tue Jun 23, 2009 1:00 am
19. Professor Robinson: A large meteorite impact crater in a certain region was thought to be the clue to explaining the mass extinction of plant and animal species that occurred at the end of the Mesozoic era. However, the crystalline structure of rocks recovered at the site indicates that the impact that formed this crater was not the culprit. When molten rocks crystallize, they display the polarity of Earth’s magnetic field at that time. But the recrystallized rocks recovered at the site display normal magnetic polarity, even though Earth’s magnetic field was reversed at the time of the mass extinction.

Each of the following is an assumption on which Professor Robinson’s argument depends EXCEPT:

(A) The crater indicates an impact of more than sufficient size to have caused the mass extinction.

(B) The recovered rocks recrystallized shortly after they melted.

(C) No other event caused the rocks to melt after the impact formed the crater.

(D) The recovered rocks melted as a result of the impact that formed the crater.

(E) The mass extinction would have occurred soon after the impact that supposedly caused it.

OA is A
plz do explain
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by sasen » Tue Jun 23, 2009 4:43 am
(A) The crater indicates an impact of more than sufficient size to have caused the mass extinction.
If size is not sufficient,it still doesnot break the argument.its how the rocks melted,their timing,their polarity etc which matters not the size.
(B) The recovered rocks recrystallized shortly after they melted.
If the rocks didnot melt immediately,professor's argument that the reverse polarity etc. would be meaningless
(C) No other event caused the rocks to melt after the impact formed the crater.
If some other event would have caused the melting,it might have affected the timing of the cooling and hence the polarity argument would again be menaingless
(D) The recovered rocks melted as a result of the impact that formed the crater.
if the rocks melted because of some other event,the polarity theory by professor would not hold correct since we are again not sure about the timing when the rocks melted and cooled and hence the polarity.
(E) The mass extinction would have occurred soon after the impact that supposedly caused it.
Though the professor rejects the claim that extinction happened because of the impact,if it had happened due to the impact,exitinction should have happened soon or else his whole argument is deemed invalid.
Join the discussion

by Domnu » Tue Jun 23, 2009 6:12 am
I don't understand why the answer isn't E... nothing is mentioned about how 'soon' anything has to happen.
Have you wondered how you could have found such a treasure? -T
Join the discussion

by sasen » Tue Jun 23, 2009 6:45 am
i know that option E is very close but there is a very subtle difference between E and A.
look at it this way: suppose that the extinction took place a century after the aforesaid time.Do u think the nutty professor would ever have bothered to make his claim.....no right? because then it brings the whole issue out of context. Asssumption E provides meaning to the professor's conclusion that "impact didnot result in the extinction"..go it or still have confusion?
Join the discussion

by Domnu » Tue Jun 23, 2009 7:10 am
That clears it up. Thanks :)
Have you wondered how you could have found such a treasure? -T
Join the discussion

by micheal_kr » Sun May 15, 2016 11:24 pm
I believe the answer should be A
Join the discussion