BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

assumption question

Expert replies
by jamesk486 » Fri Jun 01, 2007 3:49 pm
In the past, every ten-percentage-point increase in cigarette prices in the country of Coponia has decreased per capita sales of cigarettes by four percent. Coponia is about to raise taxes on cigarettes by 9 cents per pack. The average price of cigarettes in Coponia is and has been for more than a year 90 cents per pack. So the tax hike stands an excellent chance of reducing per capita sales of cigarettes by four percent.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A.Tobacco companies are unlikely to reduce their profit per pack of cigarettes to avoid an increase in the cost per pack to consumers in Coponia.
B.Previous increases in cigarette prices in Coponia have generally been due to increases in taxes on cigarettes.
C.Any decrease in per capita sales of cigarettes in Coponia will result mainly from an increase in the number of people who quit smoking entirely.
D.At present, the price of a pack of cigarettes in Coponia includes taxes that amount to less than ten percent of the total selling price.
E.The number of people in Coponia who smoke cigarettes has remained relatively constant for the past several years.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by 800guy » Fri Jun 08, 2007 10:36 am
Join the discussion

by rocky » Sat Jun 09, 2007 9:36 pm
Seems B only!
Getting into it
Join the discussion

by discreet » Sat Jun 09, 2007 11:31 pm
More close to B but I was also confused with E.
"per capita" is dependant on Number of people who smoke ?any other views?Whats the OA?
Join the discussion

by Umar82 » Tue Nov 25, 2008 9:37 am
answer is C , read the question carefully
Join the discussion

by Jatinder » Tue Nov 25, 2008 10:05 am
B/w D and E

I choose E...
(Past == present)
OA?
Keep flying
Join the discussion

by rohangupta83 » Tue Nov 25, 2008 10:20 am
imo E

if the population stays constant and cigarette consumption decreases then the consumption per capita decreases.

For example - population = 1000

consumption = 100,000 cigarette packs

per capita consumption (consumption per person) = 100,000/1000 = 100

if population stays constant = 1000

consumption decreases to 80,000

per capita consumption = 80,000/1000 = 80 (therefore, per capita consumption decreased)

Hence, imo E
Join the discussion

by schumi_gmat » Tue Nov 25, 2008 4:54 pm
IMO E.

The explanation same as Rohangupta
Join the discussion

by pre-gmat » Wed Nov 26, 2008 10:15 am
I guess the answer should be A
Join the discussion

by nervesofsteel » Wed Nov 26, 2008 10:20 am
IMO A

A.Tobacco companies are unlikely to reduce their profit per pack of cigarettes to avoid an increase in the cost per pack to consumers in Coponia.

If tobacco companies can reduce their profit .. then a tax hike will not increase price .. thus will not decrease consumption....

I tried denial test....

Please correct me if im wrong...

Whts the OA..??
Join the discussion

by nsharma » Thu Dec 11, 2008 11:00 am
What is the officail answer?

I think A is the answer for the same reasons stated by nervesofsteel.
Join the discussion

by niraj_a » Thu Dec 11, 2008 12:23 pm
B for me
Join the discussion

by 4meonly » Thu Dec 11, 2008 11:41 pm
I also vote for B

Conclusion:
So the tax hike stands an excellent chance of reducing per capita sales of cigarettes by four percent.
increased taxes ---> decrease per capeta sales

If taxes were nor the only reason for decreased sales then conclusion will not work.

B.Previous increases in cigarette prices in Coponia have generally been due to increases in taxes on cigarettes.
Negate:
Previous increases in cigarette prices in Coponia have NOT generally been due to increases in taxes on cigarettes.
Conclusion doest work here
Join the discussion

by nervesofsteel » Fri Dec 12, 2008 10:50 am
Why B is wrong IMO

every ten-percentage-point increase in cigarette prices in the country of Coponia has decreased per capita sales of cigarettes by four percent

The conclusion says every 10% hike in prices ... will lead to decrease in consumption... It doesn't matter the increase is due to Taxes or Something else...
Join the discussion

by ronniecoleman » Fri Dec 12, 2008 11:26 am
IMO A
Admission champion, Hauz khaz
011-27565856
Join the discussion