BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

assumption question

Expert replies

by pbanavara » Fri Dec 12, 2008 2:25 pm
It's got to be B

"In the past price increases of 10% => decrease of 4% in per capita sales"

The assumption is that this price increase is because of taxes which is what the conclusion says.

- pradeep
Join the discussion

Re: assumption question

by duke » Sat Dec 13, 2008 5:17 am
jamesk486 wrote:In the past, every ten-percentage-point increase in cigarette prices in the country of Coponia has decreased per capita sales of cigarettes by four percent. Coponia is about to raise taxes on cigarettes by 9 cents per pack. The average price of cigarettes in Coponia is and has been for more than a year 90 cents per pack. So the tax hike stands an excellent chance of reducing per capita sales of cigarettes by four percent.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A.Tobacco companies are unlikely to reduce their profit per pack of cigarettes to avoid an increase in the cost per pack to consumers in Coponia.
B.Previous increases in cigarette prices in Coponia have generally been due to increases in taxes on cigarettes.
C.Any decrease in per capita sales of cigarettes in Coponia will result mainly from an increase in the number of people who quit smoking entirely.
D.At present, the price of a pack of cigarettes in Coponia includes taxes that amount to less than ten percent of the total selling price.
E.The number of people in Coponia who smoke cigarettes has remained relatively constant for the past several years.
Not an easy one.
4% drop needs to be consistant in application regardless of the smoker popluation size (i.e. 4% on 100 is 4, 4% on 200 is 8, and so forth) So, in any case of increase in price by 10% point, there should be 4% drop in per capita sales. So, we don't need to have a constant number of people who smoke.
And 9 cents increase is equal to 10% point price increase?
Anyone for D? :wink:
Looking for 780~
Join the discussion

by 4meonly » Sat Dec 13, 2008 7:32 am
I think answer is not D because D speaks about he portion af the tax in the total price of the pack and it is not the assumption in logic
price increase ---> sales decrease

May be I misunderstood you?
Join the discussion

by pkman100 » Fri Dec 19, 2008 9:11 am
So what is the correct answer?

I go with B
Join the discussion

by logitech » Fri Dec 19, 2008 9:54 am
ronniecoleman wrote:IMO A
For those who have not met Ronnie before, he is the Mr. IMO of the beat the gmat forum but he is trying hard to get rid of this title. So one big thank you for him from the members of the forum!

:D
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
Join the discussion

Re: assumption question

by bluementor » Fri Dec 19, 2008 10:56 am
Conclusion: So the tax hike stands an excellent chance of reducing per capita sales of cigarettes by four percent.

What assumption did the author make to arrive at this conclusion?

B. This has got nothing to do with reducing per capita sales in future. The previous trend does not indicate anything about the future.
C. This does not support the conclusion. An assumption should support the conclusion.
D. The percentage of tax included in the price does not affect the consumer. What matters is the final price.
E. It could be that no tax hikes were enforced in the past several years. Doesn't affect the conclusion.

A. It could be that in the past, each time a 10% tax raise is imposed, the tobacco companies responds with a price hike which results in a reduction of cigarette sales. In order for the conclusion to be true, the companies must continue to do same. This is the assumption made. Choice A simply states that the probability of the companies not increasing prices (but instead reduce their profits) is very low (unlikely).

-BM-
Join the discussion

by samanthaJ79 » Fri May 13, 2016 3:25 am
B seems to be the right answer
Join the discussion