Assumption question singer lawsuit

Expert replies

kingfisher: Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts; Posts: 9; Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 1:29 am

by kingfisher » Fri Oct 01, 2010 10:38 pm

Please help friends

A famous singer recently won a lawsuit against an advertising firm for using another singer in a commercial
to evoke the famous singer's well-known rendition of a certain song. As a result of the lawsuit, advertising
firms will stop using imitators in commercials. Therefore, advertising costs will rise, since famous singers'
services cost more than those of their imitators.
The conclusion above is based on which of the following assumptions?
(A) Most people are unable to distinguish a famous singer's rendition of a song from a good imitator's
rendition of the same song.
(B) Commercials using famous singers are usually more effective than commercials using imitators of
famous singers.
(C) The original versions of some well-known songs are unavailable for use in commercials.
(D) Advertising firms will continue to use imitators to mimic the physical mannerisms of famous singers.
(E) The advertising industry will use well-known renditions of songs in commercials.

I answered B?E

Like this post

Source: Beat The GMAT — Critical Reasoning | Fri Oct 01, 2010 10:38 pm

shovan85: Community Manager; Posts: 991; Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 6:19 amFollowed by: 24 members; Location: Bangalore, India; Thanked: 146 times

by shovan85 » Fri Oct 01, 2010 11:22 pm

Conclusion: advertising costs will rise

A - whether people distinguish between a real and a imitator it does not matter for the conclusion.
B - If it is more effective then there is no ground for the singer to file a case (this stmt is kind of against the premise)
C - out of context
D - This is also against the premise as the singer has own the case.
E - left out after POE. Now the companies cannot use imitators, and they have to use well-known renditions of songs in commercials, and these songs can be sung only by original singers. Thus, obvious rise in cost

Like this post

goyalsau: Legendary Member; Posts: 866; Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2010 6:46 pm; Location: Gwalior, India; Thanked: 31 times

by goyalsau » Fri Oct 01, 2010 11:42 pm

shovan85 wrote:Conclusion: advertising costs will rise

A - whether people distinguish between a real and a imitator it does not matter for the conclusion.
B - If it is more effective then there is no ground for the singer to file a case (this stmt is kind of against the premise)
C - out of context
D - This is also against the premise as the singer has own the case.
E - left out after POE. Now the companies cannot use imitators, and they have to use well-known renditions of songs in commercials, and these songs can be sung only by original singers. Thus, obvious rise in cost

can you please explain why option C is out of scope.
what i interpret from option C. is that original version sound tracks are not available that's why they have to pay singers for their songs.

Saurabh Goyal
[email protected]
-------------------------

EveryBody Wants to Win But Nobody wants to prepare for Win.

Like this post

ashokkadam: Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts; Posts: 210; Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2008 11:25 pmFollowed by: 1 member; Thanked: 6 times

by ashokkadam » Fri Oct 01, 2010 11:47 pm

@kingfisher,
Assumptions are actually the base of any argument.
In this case, it is important to assume that advertising firms will continue to use well-known renditions of songs in commercials. Hence the answer is E.

Moreover, if it was not the case (advertising firms will NOT use well-known renditions of songs in commercials), then the argument collapses.
Hope that helps.

kingfisher wrote:Please help friends

A famous singer recently won a lawsuit against an advertising firm for using another singer in a commercial
to evoke the famous singer's well-known rendition of a certain song. As a result of the lawsuit, advertising
firms will stop using imitators in commercials. Therefore, advertising costs will rise, since famous singers'
services cost more than those of their imitators.
The conclusion above is based on which of the following assumptions?
(A) Most people are unable to distinguish a famous singer's rendition of a song from a good imitator's
rendition of the same song.
(B) Commercials using famous singers are usually more effective than commercials using imitators of
famous singers.
(C) The original versions of some well-known songs are unavailable for use in commercials.
(D) Advertising firms will continue to use imitators to mimic the physical mannerisms of famous singers.
(E) The advertising industry will use well-known renditions of songs in commercials.

I answered B?E

Force and mind are opposites; morality ends where a gun begins.

Like this post

shovan85: Community Manager; Posts: 991; Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 6:19 amFollowed by: 24 members; Location: Bangalore, India; Thanked: 146 times

by shovan85 » Sat Oct 02, 2010 12:44 am

goyalsau wrote:
shovan85 wrote:Conclusion: advertising costs will rise

C - out of context

E - left out after POE. Now the companies cannot use imitators, and they have to use well-known renditions of songs in commercials, and these songs can be sung only by original singers. Thus, obvious rise in cost

can you please explain why option C is out of scope.
what i interpret from option C. is that original version sound tracks are not available that's why they have to pay singers for their songs.

The original versions of some well-known songs are unavailable for use in commercials. That means some well-known songs are available. So when those songs which are available are played then it will not increase the cost of advertisements but decrease

Like this post

frank1: Legendary Member; Posts: 537; Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2010 10:06 pmFollowed by: 1 member; Thanked: 14 times

by frank1 » Sat Oct 02, 2010 1:06 am

I think some book told that...before you go to option ...think of what might be best answer (if u were to answer on your own)
that technique worked in this question...(sometimes it can be timeconsuimg)

i was searching for option E among the answer choice...

good it was there....
so easy kill this one..

GMAT score is equally counted as your GPA and 78 clicks can change you life.

Like this post

abhi.genx7: Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts; Posts: 85; Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2010 3:49 am; Location: Hyderbad, India; GMAT Score:660

by abhi.genx7 » Sat Oct 02, 2010 11:15 pm

E it is i think ; The only reason they expect their coststo go up is BECAUSE THEY WILL USE THE SONGS and now that they can't use imitators , their costs will go up .
If they don't use The songs , they can reduce costs by any other means .
Correct me if I'm wrong.

Like this post

Post new topic Post Reply

• Page 1 of 1

GMAT Course Reviews

560 reviews

1168 reviews

431 reviews

359 reviews

147 reviews

5/5

5 Star (560 Reviews)

"Target Test Prep is the closest to the official version of the GMAT exam, about 99% accuracy in terms of the quality and quantity of information. The course has excellently created singular sets of focused lessons and tests for every possible topic that one could come across in the official GMAT exam."

"The TTP course maximizes the efficiency of the time you spend studying. It will take time and effort but I could almost guarantee that if you complete the course exactly as it is laid out you will get an amazing score. They also have a very responsive team willing to help with any questions you might have."

"TTP has two things that I think no other test prep company offers: A teaching approach that reinforces understanding and an attitude that will give you the mental preparedness needed to succeed on the test. TTP gives you a deep understanding of the concept you need to know while teaching you how to think."

Write a Review