Ms. Evangeline Rose argued that money and time invested in acquiring a professional degree are totally wasted. As evidence supporting her arguement, she offered the case of a man who, at considerable expense of money and time, completed his law degree and then married and lived as a house-husband, taking care of their children and working part time at a day care center so his wife could persue her career.
Ms. Rose makes the unsupported assumption that:
A. an education in the law is useful only in pursuing law-related activities
B. what was not acceptable 25 years ago may very well be acceptable today
C. wealth is more important than learning
D. professional success is a function of the quality of one's education
E. only the study of law can be considered professional study
OA later.
Ms. Rose makes the unsupported assumption that:
A. an education in the law is useful only in pursuing law-related activities
B. what was not acceptable 25 years ago may very well be acceptable today
C. wealth is more important than learning
D. professional success is a function of the quality of one's education
E. only the study of law can be considered professional study
OA later.
"There is nothing either good or bad - but thinking makes it so" - Shakespeare.
