BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Assumption CR

Expert replies
by charu_mahajan » Thu Oct 18, 2012 2:11 pm
Adoption agency representative: It is true that eight of our last ten babies have been placed with parents who were personally acquainted with at least one of our staff members before initiating the adoption process. However, there is no truth to the accusation against us of favoritism; our decisions have been guided solely by the best interests of the children. Indeed, all ten babies' new parents far surpassed the adoption criteria set both by the law and by our own policy.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the representative's argument depends?

1) The agency's prior placements of babies with parents who were previously acquainted with its staff have not, in general, been more successful than those with parents unacquainted with the staff.

2) Of those prospective parents who substantially surpassed the criteria for adoption, most were personally acquainted with agency staff before beginning the application process.

3) For a time period equal in duration to that during which the data were collected, the average number of babies placed by the agency is close to ten.

4) Most prospective parents who apply to adopt babies do not meet the agency's criteria for adoption.

5) The agency will only place babies with parents who not only meet the legal and institutional criteria for adoption, but who in fact surpass those criteria.

Source : MGMAT
OA : After some discussion
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by ihatemaths » Thu Oct 18, 2012 10:11 pm
D or 4 is it the answer ? I tried negating D , it invalidates the conclusion of representatives claim of "no favouritsm"
Join the discussion

by anuprajan5 » Thu Oct 18, 2012 10:16 pm
The answer is B

The reason being that the parents need to clear the criterion first before being given the babies. If they didn't, then there would be favoritism involved.

Regards
Anup
Join the discussion

by ihatemaths » Thu Oct 18, 2012 10:44 pm
I am really weak at negating the answer choices . Could someone post their views of the methods to negate.
Join the discussion

by charu_mahajan » Fri Oct 19, 2012 10:17 am
Hi All,

Here is the official answer -

OA: B

I'd appreciate if someone can explain this choice in detail.
Join the discussion

by gmatdriller » Fri Oct 19, 2012 4:06 pm
charu_mahajan wrote:Hi All,

Here is the official answer -

OA: B

I'd appreciate if someone can explain this choice in detail.
Agency gave children to 8(of 10 final shortlisted) parents for adoption.
Critics say: the practice is biased (only those who knew agency staff got a child.

Think about it this way: Imagine that of a total 100 prospective parents, almost ALL knew (or are friends of) agency staffs; would the critics say the process is biased or repleted with favoritism? Familiarity or acquaintance is not an exclusive advantage to virtually all those under consideration


Agency says it gives out the babies to qualified parents and in the best interest of the children.

For the process to be fair as implied, agency reps must have assumed above bold text.

Not an expert but this is my 2 cents...
Join the discussion

by charu_mahajan » Sat Oct 20, 2012 6:15 am
The answer is B

The reason being that the parents need to clear the criterion first before being given the babies. If they didn't, then there would be favoritism involved.

Regards
Anup
@ anupranjan

I think i did not understand the wording of this option in the beginning.

2) Of those prospective parents who substantially surpassed the criteria for adoption, most were personally acquainted with agency staff before beginning the application process.

What I understood: Parents surpassed the criteria after the application process.
What you seem to say: Surpassed criteria -> got acquainted -> began application process.

Please correct me if I'm wrong.
Join the discussion

by anuprajan5 » Sat Oct 20, 2012 6:31 am
Charu,

If we had 100 parents and 10 of them got selected, out of which 8 were known before the selection process, then there is favoritism involved.

But if we had 100 parents and 10 of them cleared the criterion (irrespective of whether they knew the staff) and most of these people were known to the staff, then there is no favoritism. The crucial part being that they have to clear the criterion without bias.

Regards
Anup
Join the discussion