BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Assumption based CR PRoblem

Expert replies
by batwaraanirudh » Fri Sep 27, 2013 1:14 am
The dean of computing must be respected by the academic staff and be competent to oversee the use of computers on campus. The only deans whom academics respect are those who hold doctoral degrees, and only someone who really knows about computers can competently oversee the use of computers on campus. Furthermore, the board of trustees has decided that the dean of computing must be selected from among this university's staff. Therefore, the dean of computing must be a professor from this university's computer science department.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

(A) Academics respect only people who hold doctoral degrees.

(B) All of this university's professors have obtained doctoral degrees.

(C) At this university, every professor who holds a doctoral degree in computer science really
knows about computers.

(D) All academics who hold doctoral degrees are respected by their academic colleagues.

(E) Among this university's staff members with doctoral degrees, only those in the computer science department really know about computers.

Need help to solve this question.

OA: E
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by theCodeToGMAT » Fri Sep 27, 2013 3:17 am
Answer [spoiler]{E}[/spoiler]
use Negation Technique..
We need to negate the conclusion and show its false case.

Option {E} ....Only those in Computer science department do not know about computer.

So this kills the Fact in the Question Stem.
R A H U L
Join the discussion

by ceilidh.erickson » Fri Sep 27, 2013 6:51 am
We're given a set of necessary conditions that the new dean must have:
- respected by staff => has a PhD
- knows about computers
- must be on this university's staff

The conclusion is that the new dean must be a professor from this university's computer science department. So now we need to question whether those necessary conditions lead directly to this conclusion...
- does someone who has a PhD have to be a professor? It's possible that a janitor on the staff has a PhD
- does someone who knows about computers have to be in the computer science department? Couldn't people in other departments know about computers?

Sometimes the best way to find the assumptions is to play the "what if?" game. The assumptions here are that everyone with a PhD is working as a professor, and that only professors in the computer science department know about computers.

as theCode pointed out, the negation test is a good way to prove that E is correct.
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
Join the discussion

by gui_guimaraes » Mon Jun 03, 2019 9:54 am
ceilidh.erickson wrote:We're given a set of necessary conditions that the new dean must have:
- respected by staff => has a PhD
- knows about computers
- must be on this university's staff

The conclusion is that the new dean must be a professor from this university's computer science department. So now we need to question whether those necessary conditions lead directly to this conclusion...
- does someone who has a PhD have to be a professor? It's possible that a janitor on the staff has a PhD
- does someone who knows about computers have to be in the computer science department? Couldn't people in other departments know about computers?

Sometimes the best way to find the assumptions is to play the "what if?" game. The assumptions here are that everyone with a PhD is working as a professor, and that only professors in the computer science department know about computers.

as theCode pointed out, the negation test is a good way to prove that E is correct.
How to eliminate C? Tks! :)
Join the discussion