BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

As the former Chair...

Expert replies
by mksreeram » Wed Jul 23, 2008 10:25 pm
As the former chair of the planning board for 18 consecutive years and a board member for 28 years, Joan Philkill attended more than 400 meetings and reviewed more than 700 rezoning applications.

A) As the former
B) The former
C) Former
D) She was
E) As the
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by raunekk » Wed Jul 23, 2008 11:01 pm
C????
Join the discussion

by Canman » Thu Jul 24, 2008 7:15 am
Answer is E.

Answers with the word "former" are not parallel with board member- you would expect "former chair and former board member".

Also, more importantly adding former changes the meaning of the sentence.

She atteneded (past tense) those meetings and and reviewed those applications as THE chair and/or board member, not as THE "former" chair/board member.
Join the discussion

by Vignesh.4384 » Thu Jul 24, 2008 9:12 am
i think it is E too
Join the discussion

by reachac » Thu Jul 24, 2008 9:23 am
Canman wrote:Answer is E.

Answers with the word "former" are not parallel with board member- you would expect "former chair and former board member".

Also, more importantly adding former changes the meaning of the sentence.

She atteneded (past tense) those meetings and and reviewed those applications as THE chair and/or board member, not as THE "former" chair/board member.
IMO E.

but @Canman, I'm sorry but I don agree with ur reasoning of parallelism, a person can no longer be the chair but he/she can continue as a member of the organization.
Join the discussion

by Canman » Thu Jul 24, 2008 10:39 am
Point well taken on the parallelism, reachac.

Thanks.
Join the discussion

by NSNguyen » Sat Jul 26, 2008 10:44 pm
As is used for comparing verb.
I would go with D,
any one can explain?
Please share your idea and your reasoning :D
https://bmnmed.com/home/
https://nguyensinguyen.vietnam21.org
Join the discussion

by jube » Sun Jul 18, 2010 6:50 am
Ok, I'm absolutely confused about this one. Can anyone explain why a, b and c are wrong? Thanks!
Join the discussion

by jube » Mon Jul 19, 2010 1:10 am
bumping it once more... would really appreciate help with this one!
Join the discussion

by NSNguyen » Mon Jul 19, 2010 10:38 pm
She can modify for Joan Philkill.
Others cannot.
Please share your idea and your reasoning :D
https://bmnmed.com/home/
https://nguyensinguyen.vietnam21.org
Join the discussion

by kvcpk » Tue Jul 20, 2010 12:42 am
IMO E

My first thought was A. But soon realised that someone cant be a formaer cair for 18 continuous years.
So picked E.
Join the discussion

by uwhusky » Tue Jul 20, 2010 1:08 am
I guess for A to be right, we would have to say:

As the former chair of the planning board for 18 consecutive years and a [current/former] board member for 28 years, Joan Philkill attended more than 400 meetings and reviewed more than 700 rezoning applications.
Join the discussion

by jerseygirl » Sun Sep 19, 2010 5:19 pm
uwhusky wrote:I guess for A to be right, we would have to say:

As the former chair of the planning board for 18 consecutive years and a [current/former] board member for 28 years, Joan Philkill attended more than 400 meetings and reviewed more than 700 rezoning applications.
i'm still a little mystified as to why A is wrong...


i thought the sentence meant that she was a former chair of the planning board...a position she filled for 18 years...

if the sentence were to read, "As the former chair of the board, Joan attended more than 400 meetings.." wouldn't it be correct? why does tacking on "For 18 consecutive years" make it wrong? please help. thanks!
Join the discussion

by uwhusky » Sun Sep 19, 2010 5:55 pm
I must have posted the original response before I understood the question.

The issue with A is that it is illogical to suggest that Joan was a "former chair" for 18 consecutive years.

For example, you would say that you were a teacher for 18 years, but you wouldn't say that you were a former teacher for 18 years.

Hopefully I make sense in the explanation =).
Yep.
Join the discussion

by ankurmit » Sun Sep 19, 2010 8:27 pm
IMO E

@Uwhusky you are right.
--------
Ankur mittal
Join the discussion