BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

As rainfall began to decrease in the Southwest

Expert replies
by pnk » Mon Jun 14, 2010 7:50 am
OG

As rainfall began to decrease in the Southwest about the middle of the twelfth century, most of the Monument Valley Anasazi abandoned their homes to join other clans whose access to water was less limited.

A. whose access to water was less limited
B. where there was access to water that was less limited
C. where they had less limited water access
D. with less limitations on water access
E. having less limitations to water access


[spoiler]OA - A;

Not satisfaied with OG explanation.

OG says for C - they ambiguous and might refer to either Anasazi or other Clans; 'less limited water access' is awkward. How can 'they' is ambiguous - they cleary refers to subject noun of the previous clause (both playing the same role in their respective clause...ie noun). Though 'other clans' is object

OG says for E - 'limitations' countable so use 'fewer'; 'having' is ambiguous bcoz it is unclear whether it refers to Anasazi or other clans. But, for 'having' very clearly refers to 'other clans' (verbing without comma). It would be great if some one also help me with 'limitations' countable - how[/spoiler]
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by kvcpk » Mon Jun 14, 2010 7:53 am
You are posting good questions.. I was surprised to see that OA is A.
"whose access to water was less limited" loks awkward to me too..
Join the discussion

by hardik.jadeja » Mon Jun 14, 2010 8:24 am
There in one more problem with C.

"Clans" is basically a group of people.

"where" is placed adjacent to "clans", so "where" is modifying "clans". "where" should be used to modify nouns referring to places, not the group of people. If you want to modify a noun representing group of people, use "whose".

Yes, limitation is a countable noun. For ex: A tennis player has two limitations. First, his service is weak. Second, his forehand is weak.
Join the discussion

by uwhusky » Mon Jun 14, 2010 8:32 am
The issue with C I believe is the usage of the relative pronoun, "where", which is referring to "clan" and is incorrect.

After some thoughts, I realize that limitations to water access sounds very funny, too. I have "water access" sounds very awkward compare to I have "access to water".
Join the discussion

by minhphuoc » Sat Nov 24, 2012 1:25 pm
I think one of the ambiguous in C is 'limited water access'. Which noun limited modify? Water of access?
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1