BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

As fast as it was VS When it was

Expert replies
by rohangupta83 » Thu Nov 20, 2008 5:21 am
9. In the 1980's the rate of increase of the minority population of the United States was nearly twice as fast as the 1970's.
(A) twice as fast as
(B) twice as fast as it was in
(C) twice what it was in
(D) two times faster than that of
(E) two times greater than
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

Re: As fast as it was VS When it was

by karmayogi » Thu Nov 20, 2008 5:35 am
rohangupta83 wrote:9. In the 1980's the rate of increase of the minority population of the United States was nearly twice as fast as the 1970's.
(A) twice as fast as
(B) twice as fast as it was in
(C) twice what it was in
(D) two times faster than that of
(E) two times greater than
A comparing rate with year
B it is ambiguous.
C unnecessarily interrogative
D correctly comparing rate of ... in 1980 with 'that of the 1970's'.
E again comparing rate with year
Join the discussion

Re: As fast as it was VS When it was

by iamcste » Thu Nov 20, 2008 6:09 am
rohangupta83 wrote:9. In the 1980's the rate of increase of the minority population of the United States was nearly twice as fast as the 1970's.
(A) twice as fast as

The key here is that we cannot use fast (or slow, for that matter) for rate--we don't say a fast or slow rate, do we? we say high or low rate

or, can we say when we say rate--as fast as or faster than becomes redundant..I mean when I say care runs at 30 miles/hour..I am trying to say how fast it runs ...so "as fast as" is redundant when we already have "rate of increase"

(B) twice as fast as it was in

The key here is that we cannot use fast (or slow, for that matter) for rate--we don't say a fast or slow rate, do we? we say high or low rate

(C) twice what it was in

Avoids fast and greater than

Correct. Adverb "nearly" modifies adj twice

" what it " refers to the "rate of minority population of US" in that particular year

(D) two times faster than that of

The key here is that we cannot use fast (or slow, for that matter) for rate--we don't say a fast or slow rate, do we? we say high or low rate

(E) two times greater than

The key here is that we cannot use fast (or slow, for that matter) for rate--we don't say a fast or slow rate, do we? we say high or low rate
Join the discussion

by Carloblacksun » Thu Nov 20, 2008 7:30 am
I would say C because the subject is not the INCREASE, but THE RATE of increase...a rate cannot be greater or faster, but simply be "twice" or "half"
Join the discussion

by Tryingmybest » Thu Nov 20, 2008 9:55 am
To me its C.

The way I look at it is in Choices other than C all have a word which is redundant to " increase" ie faster or greater
Join the discussion

Re: As fast as it was VS When it was

by logitech » Thu Nov 20, 2008 11:51 am
rohangupta83 wrote:9. In the 1980's the rate of increase of the minority population of the United States was nearly twice as fast as the 1970's.
(A) twice as fast as
(B) twice as fast as it was in
(C) twice what it was in
(D) two times faster than that of
(E) two times greater than
rate of increase & fast redundant A,B and D are gone

between C and E

E is out because rate is compared to 1970's

Hence, C

It is not ambigious in C, rate of increase is our only bet for IT ( logically )
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1