RBBmba@2014 wrote:Hi GMATGuruNY,
Few quick questions on this: actors who include and actors, whose ranks included -- is there any PRIME differences between these two phrases EXCEPT the Tense aspect ?
Isn't the second PHRASE less direct than the first one ?
Is this usage common and conventional on GMAT ?
A
generation =
approximately 30 years -- the time it takes
a group of people to grow up and bear children.
Implication:
Approximately 30 years pass between one generation of people and the next.
B, rephrased in the past:
several generations of actors who included Marlon Brando
Conveyed meaning:
At some point, ACTORS taught by Stella Adler INCLUDED MARLON BRANDO.
Thirty years later, DIFFERENT ACTORS taught by Stella Adler INCLUDED MARLON BRANDO.
Another thirty years later, an entirely NEW GROUP of actors taught by Stella Adler INCLUDED MARLON BRANDO.
This meaning implies that Marlon Brando was INCLUDED over the course of 90 YEARS.
Not the intended meaning.
In the OA,
ranks = members of EVERY RANKING.
In other words, the entire LIST of members.
Thus, the OA conveys the following meaning:
The LIST of actors taught by Stella Adler includes Marlon Brando.
This meaning is sensical.
Last edited by
GMATGuruNY on Tue Aug 18, 2015 9:59 am, edited 1 time in total.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at
[email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3