BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

artificial inteligence

Expert replies
by pradeepkaushal9518 » Wed Jul 21, 2010 2:20 am
Artificial intelligence emerged during the late 1950's as an academic discipline based on the assumption that computers are able to be programmed to think like people.


(A) are able to be programmed to think like people
(B) were able to be programmed to think as people
(C) can be programmed to think as people can
(D) could be programmed to think like people
(E) are capable of being programmed to think like people do
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by brijesh » Wed Jul 21, 2010 2:31 am
pradeepkaushal9518 wrote:Artificial intelligence emerged during the late 1950's as an academic discipline based on the assumption that computers are able to be programmed to think like people.


(A) are able to be programmed to think like people (should be in past tense)
(B) were able to be programmed to think as people (like people)
(C) can be programmed to think as people can (As A)
(D) could be programmed to think like people (right ans)
(E) are capable of being programmed to think like people do
Join the discussion

by kvcpk » Wed Jul 21, 2010 5:09 am
Good Question.. IMO D.

Only C, D are close.

in C - can be programmed to think as people can (be programmed) gives wrong meaning.

hence pick D
Join the discussion

by tomada » Wed Jul 21, 2010 7:33 am
One more for D
Join the discussion

by uwhusky » Wed Jul 21, 2010 7:47 am
Artificial intelligence emerged during the late 1950's as an academic discipline based on the assumption that computers could be programmed to think like people.

Well, since "like" can only compare nouns, this sentence is somewhat illogical to say that computers could think like people. I think a better construction would be that computers could think as people do [think].
Join the discussion

by tomada » Wed Jul 21, 2010 8:01 am
"...assumption that computers (noun) could be programmed to think like people (noun)"
I'm not seeing the problem.

uwhusky wrote:Artificial intelligence emerged during the late 1950's as an academic discipline based on the assumption that computers could be programmed to think like people.

Well, since "like" can only compare nouns, this sentence is somewhat illogical to say that computers could think like people. I think a better construction would be that computers could think as people do [think].
Join the discussion

by paes » Wed Jul 21, 2010 8:01 am
D : like is used to compare nouns, so looking incorrect.

Expert help needed.
Join the discussion

by tomada » Wed Jul 21, 2010 8:03 am
computers = noun
people = noun

What am I misssing?

paes wrote:D : like is used to compare nouns, so looking incorrect.

Expert help needed.
Join the discussion

by uwhusky » Wed Jul 21, 2010 8:36 am
tomada wrote:computers = noun
people = noun

What am I misssing?

paes wrote:D : like is used to compare nouns, so looking incorrect.

Expert help needed.
Are we comparing computer's ability to think or simply computers?

If we are comparing computers to people, then like is correct, but above sentence is comparing computer's ability to think to people's ability to think.

Actually, I guess it's the same thing.

"computer, is [adjective], like people" noun is comparing to noun.

If we take off the BE verb, then as would make more sense:

Computer can think as people can think.
Join the discussion

by tomada » Wed Jul 21, 2010 8:51 am
I'm comparing computers to people, with the thinking process as the applicable trait.
I realize that the usage of like is the 'sticking point', but I believe that its usage is acceptable for this type of comparison.

uwhusky wrote:
tomada wrote:computers = noun
people = noun

What am I misssing?

paes wrote:D : like is used to compare nouns, so looking incorrect.

Expert help needed.
Are we comparing computer's ability to think or simply computers?

If we are comparing computers to people, then like is correct, but above sentence is comparing computer's ability to think to people's ability to think.
Join the discussion

by uwhusky » Wed Jul 21, 2010 8:59 am
I concurred. I realized afterward that "programmed to think" is really the predicate adjective modifying the noun. Thus the comparison is valid, noun to noun.
Join the discussion

by tomada » Wed Jul 21, 2010 9:00 am
I'm wondering if this would be considered a '700'-level question, because it really is quite subtle.
Join the discussion

by uwhusky » Wed Jul 21, 2010 9:04 am
tomada wrote:I'm wondering if this would be considered a '700'-level question, because it really is quite subtle.
It could very well be. There is a lot of minor and subtle details put into some of the wrong choices. If you do not understand the role of an auxiliary verb (helping verb) like "can", you might choose C.

I think I have a little better understanding of a decent strategy to attacking SC. Understanding the structure is the foundation used to quickly eliminate most wrong answers, but it's the ability to spot minor errors that will put you above 700.
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Wed Jul 21, 2010 9:11 am
pradeepkaushal9518 wrote:Artificial intelligence emerged during the late 1950's as an academic discipline based on the assumption that computers are able to be programmed to think like people.


(A) are able to be programmed to think like people
(B) were able to be programmed to think as people
(C) can be programmed to think as people can
(D) could be programmed to think like people
(E) are capable of being programmed to think like people do
Quickest approach:

The non-underlined verb emerged is in the past tense, so we can eliminate any answer choices that use a present tense verb. Eliminate A, C and E.

Stay in one tense unless a change in tense is needed.

In B, the verb were able is in the wrong tense because the emergence of the academic discipline and the programming of the computers did not happen at the same time. The emergence happened first, then the programming. We need a verb that indicates this order of events. Eliminate B.

In D, the verb could implies the correct order of events. The discipline emerged because people thought that the computers could be programmed (isometime after the emergence of the discipline).

Hope this helps!
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by paes » Wed Jul 21, 2010 9:25 am
Thanks Guru.

Everything is looking right with D except the usage of 'like'

D says :
could be programmed to think like people

But I think, it should be :

could be programmed to think as people do

I am not able to justify usage of 'like'. I think that we should use 'as' ( intention is to compare the two clauses )

Please clarify.
Join the discussion