BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Art Work

Expert replies
by pandeyvineet24 » Wed Dec 24, 2008 10:29 am
We commonly speak of aesthetic judgments as subjective, and in the short term they are, since critics often disagree about the value of a particular contemporary work of art. But over time, the subjective element disappears. When works of art have continued to delight audiences for centuries, as have the paintings of Michelangelo, the music of Bach, and the plays of Shakespeare, we can objectively call them great.
The statements above best support which of the following conclusions?
(A) When Michelangelo, Bach, and Shakespeare were alive, critics disagreed about the value of their work.
(B) The value of a contemporary work of art cannot be objectively measured.
(C) The reputation of a work of art often fluctuates greatly from one generation to the next.
(D) The mere fact that a work of art has endured for centuries does not establish its greatness.
(E) If critics agree about the value of a particular cotemporary work of art, then the work can objectively be called great.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Re: Art Work

by showbu » Wed Dec 24, 2008 1:21 pm
I vote for D.

"When works of art have continued to delight audiences for centuries...we can objectively call them great." is playing the evidence of "But over time, the subjective element disappears. "

We can say it is not long time span that make the greatness of the work (There might be other reasons, like the objective comments on its characters), because time span is not going to serve as a reason why the subjective elements disappears.


pandeyvineet24 wrote:We commonly speak of aesthetic judgments as subjective, and in the short term they are, since critics often disagree about the value of a particular contemporary work of art. But over time, the subjective element disappears. When works of art have continued to delight audiences for centuries, as have the paintings of Michelangelo, the music of Bach, and the plays of Shakespeare, we can objectively call them great.
The statements above best support which of the following conclusions?
(A) When Michelangelo, Bach, and Shakespeare were alive, critics disagreed about the value of their work.
(B) The value of a contemporary work of art cannot be objectively measured.
(C) The reputation of a work of art often fluctuates greatly from one generation to the next.
(D) The mere fact that a work of art has endured for centuries does not establish its greatness.
(E) If critics agree about the value of a particular cotemporary work of art, then the work can objectively be called great.
Join the discussion

by acecoolan » Wed Dec 24, 2008 7:01 pm
I think this question is best answered by this post from Stacey

https://www.beatthegmat.com/1000crgmatm- ... t1796.html
:)

otherwise I found A or B to be the only 2 which were reasonably close

-A
Join the discussion

by Rochak » Sat Mar 12, 2011 11:32 pm
Option A - the author cities the names of these three artists as examples for works of art have continued to delight audiences for centuries. So no conclusion can be made bout A

Option B - 'We commonly speak of aesthetic judgments as subjective, and in the short term they are,' Thus B is true

Rest of the options can easily be eliminated :)
Join the discussion

by wayofjungle » Mon Mar 14, 2011 9:32 pm
Answer choice 'B' seems best and tackles a brazen assumption. I eliminated C,D,E and at first was going to choose A but realized B applies much better to the scope of the passage and the details of the actual argument with the words subjective vs. objective.

The conclusion: "When works of art have continued to delight audiences for centuries, ... we can objectively call them great."

The assumptions: there are no other reasons a painting is great, all old paintings that are liked today are great, no new modern paintings are great instead the are only great after standing the test of time
Join the discussion

by jaygirl001 » Tue Mar 15, 2011 11:23 am
Eliminated C, D, E

B- The value of a contemporary work of art cannot be objectively measured
The argument does not say this "cannot" determined....it simply says that judgments on value are subjective...but in the "short term"

A) When Michelangelo, Bach, and Shakespeare were alive, critics disagreed about the value of their work....is supported by the the second part of the first sentence "critics often disagree........"

I go with A
Join the discussion