BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Art's Decline

Expert replies
by fighting_cax » Sun Apr 19, 2009 3:25 pm
Reviewer: The book Art’s Decline argues that European painters today lack skills that were common among European painters of preceding centuries. In this the book must be right, since its analysis of 100 paintings, 50 old and 50 contemporary, demonstrates convincingly that none of the contemporary paintings are executed as skillfully as the older paintings.
Which of the following points to the most serious logical flaw in the reviewer's argument?
(A) The paintings chosen by the book's author for analysis could be those that most support the book's thesis.
(B) There could be criteria other than the technical skill of the artist by which to evaluate a painting.
(C) The title of the book could cause readers to accept the book's thesis even before they read the analysis of the paintings that supports it.
(D) The particular methods currently used by European painters could require less artistic skill than do methods used by painters in other parts of the world.
(E) A reader who was not familiar with the language of art criticism might not be convinced by the book's analysis of the 100 paintings.

OA is A

Please explain.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Re: Art's Decline

by mehravikas » Sun Apr 19, 2009 7:52 pm
I almost got the correct answer, my two serious contenders were A and B.

A - talks about that book is to prove that new art has declined so the contemporary paintings used as examples in the book must be supporting book's thesis i.e. to prove that new art has declined.

B - There could be other ways to analyze the painters other than skill used in this book

I chose B...got it wrong.
fighting_cax wrote:Reviewer: The book Art’s Decline argues that European painters today lack skills that were common among European painters of preceding centuries. In this the book must be right, since its analysis of 100 paintings, 50 old and 50 contemporary, demonstrates convincingly that none of the contemporary paintings are executed as skillfully as the older paintings.
Which of the following points to the most serious logical flaw in the reviewer's argument?
(A) The paintings chosen by the book's author for analysis could be those that most support the book's thesis.
(B) There could be criteria other than the technical skill of the artist by which to evaluate a painting.
(C) The title of the book could cause readers to accept the book's thesis even before they read the analysis of the paintings that supports it.
(D) The particular methods currently used by European painters could require less artistic skill than do methods used by painters in other parts of the world.
(E) A reader who was not familiar with the language of art criticism might not be convinced by the book's analysis of the 100 paintings.

OA is A

Please explain.
Join the discussion

by shibal » Thu Apr 23, 2009 12:58 pm
definitely A.
since the statement says that 100 paintings were chosen, it gives us a tip that we can trace down 'statistics' mismatches.
the conclusion basically says that contemporary painters suxs, when comparing to old painters. the argument is based when it gets 50 paintings from each time period....
however, if the author chose the paintings for an analysis that could support the book's thesis, the conclusion that contemporary painters suxs isn't valid.... weakening the argument... hope it helps....
Join the discussion

by fighting_cax » Wed Apr 29, 2009 1:29 am
Why can't choice B be the answer?
Join the discussion

by ketkoag » Wed Apr 29, 2009 1:11 pm
fighting_cax wrote:Why can't choice B be the answer?
B is not correct coz it has unnecessarily mentioned the technical skills, but in the stimuli "skills" is mentioned. also in the stimuli, the criteria for evaluation is never discussed, so this would be a weak contender.
Join the discussion

by ashley.com » Sun May 15, 2016 3:39 am
Clearly A
Join the discussion

by alanforde800Maximus » Sun May 20, 2018 4:01 pm
Bumping for experts review.
Join the discussion