BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

arithmetic properties problem

Expert replies
by gibran » Sat May 17, 2008 7:30 am
The numbers x and y are three-digit positive integers, and x + y is a four-digit integer. The tens digit of x equals 7 and the tens digit of y equals 5. If x < y, which of the following must be true?
I. The units digit of x + y is greater than the units digit of either x or y.
II. The tens digit of x + y equals 2.
III. The hundreds digit of y is at least 5.
A. II only
B. III only
C. I and II
D. I and III
E. II and III
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by moneyman » Sat May 17, 2008 8:43 am
Is it E ?
Maxx
Join the discussion

by zacharyz » Sat May 17, 2008 6:19 pm
Given: x < y
x = n7m
y = p5r
-------------
x + y = abcd

Note that the only thing you can tell is that the hundreds digits (plus any carryover) must sum to 10 or greater. We know that there is a 1 carried over from the tens column, so n+p+1>9 or n+p>8

Let's look at each individually

I. The units digit of x + y is greater than the units digit of either x or y.


This DOES NOT need to be true. m+r based on my convention can be any numbers (5 and 1 or 7 and 8). I. is asking you if you NEED the values to result in carrying over a value into the next column.

Think about this. There is nothing you need to do with the singles column that will make a difference to us at this point. We know that the tens column already adds to 10 or greater and is carrying a digit over. If the singles column doesn't bring a 1 over, then it doesn't matter. The only way you would start caring is if the tens column otherwise added to 9. Then carrying a 1 would overflow the tens column. Since this is not the case, the singles digit is pretty much irrelevant (unless for some reason it was necessary to show that y>x).

II. The tens digit of x + y equals 2.

This DOES NOT need to be true. As already explained in I, there could be a carryover from the singles column. if m+r<10, then the tens (7+5) results in a 2. However, if there is m+r >9, then the tens is 7+5+1 = 13.
There still is no evidence to what is in the singles column.

III. The hundreds digit of y is at least 5.

First of all, I already do not believe that I or II has to be true, and there is no "NONE" option. So III has to be true or I have missed something earlier.

As explained in the "given" section, the hundreds digits MUST total to 10 or above. The minimum requirements for this is that the hundreds are 4 and 5, plus a carryover from the tens digits, or they are 5 and 5.

At this point, we know that the hundreds digit of 5 MUST be at least 5. The hundreds digit of x must be at least 4 since the tens column did bring over a 1.

Therefore, the answer is III. Only (B)
Join the discussion

by chidcguy » Wed May 21, 2008 10:42 am
III. The hundreds digit of y is at least 5.

First of all, I already do not believe that I or II has to be true, and there is no "NONE" option. So III has to be true or I have missed something earlier.

I am with you till here

As explained in the "given" section, the hundreds digits MUST total to 10 or above. The minimum requirements for this is that the hundreds are 4 and 5, plus a carryover from the tens digits, or they are 5 and 5.

They dont have to be (4,5) or (5,5). we can still satisfy the condition of X+y being 4 digits with out any carry over with (4,6) or (6,4) (3,7) or (7,3) and so on For example 476,653 or 676,453

At this point, we know that the hundreds digit of 5 MUST be at least 5. The hundreds digit of x must be at least 4 since the tens column did bring over a 1.

I would say either x or y has to have hundred's digit greater than 5 but we can't say that Y has hundered's digit greater than 5

Therefore, the answer is III. Only (B)[/i]
Join the discussion

by netigen » Wed May 21, 2008 11:11 am
only III is true

x = 476
y = 558

since x+y>999, y has to be >500
Join the discussion

by chidcguy » Wed May 21, 2008 11:19 am
My bad, I missed the X < Y condition and hence I was ending up with different pairs.
Join the discussion