BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

are there really problems this tedious?

Expert replies
by abcdefg » Sun Jul 12, 2009 7:33 am
A cylindrical tank of radius R and height H must be redesigned to hold approximately twice as much liquid. Which of the following changes would be farthest from the new design requirements?

a 100% increase in R and a 50% decrease in H
a 30% decrease in R and a 300% increase in H
a 10% decrease in R and a 150% increase in H
a 40% increase in R and no change in H
a 50% increase in R and a 20% decrease in H

OA [spoiler] E. But the suggested solution provided is to just check every single one of them and compare...Anyone got any tricks or shortcuts to work through this faster? [/spoiler].
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

Re: are there really problems this tedious?

by dtweah » Sun Jul 12, 2009 8:19 am
abcdefg wrote:A cylindrical tank of radius R and height H must be redesigned to hold approximately twice as much liquid. Which of the following changes would be farthest from the new design requirements?

a 100% increase in R and a 50% decrease in H
a 30% decrease in R and a 300% increase in H
a 10% decrease in R and a 150% increase in H
a 40% increase in R and no change in H
a 50% increase in R and a 20% decrease in H

OA [spoiler] E. But the suggested solution provided is to just check every single one of them and compare...Anyone got any tricks or shortcuts to work through this faster? [/spoiler].
First the problem is not tedious at all. Very simple. This is a problem that tests your ability to manipulate percentages.

You are looking for the value that is furthest away from 2pir^2 h

A. pi 4r^2 h/2 is the same so eliminate

B .49r^2 x 4h =1.96

C. .81r^2 x 2.5=2.025
D 1.96 r^2 = 1.96

E. 2.25 r^2 x .8 h= 1.8

The suggested solution is the easiest. You can solve this under 1 min. Once u execute A, you don't have to write r^2 or h on your paper. U are just squaring one number and multiply by another. The form you put these numbers in will make it easier or difficult. How fast you can process percent increase or decrease is another factor. Knowing the squares of all numbers from 1 to 20 is still another factor. So overall not a tedious problem at all.
Join the discussion

by shibal » Sun Jul 12, 2009 10:22 am
try to get easy number such as 5 and 10.... they are (IMO) the easiest ones to manipulate...
Join the discussion