BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Archaeologists have discovered three sites showing conclusiv

Expert replies
by Mike@Magoosh » Tue Aug 20, 2013 12:29 pm
Archaeologists have discovered three sites showing conclusive evidence for the mastery of fire in Tanzania, from a period slightly after the time that Homo habilis was present in Africa. These sites clearly were founded by Homo erectus, the descendant species of Homo habilis that migrated north, out of Africa and into Asia. Homo erectus was known to have mastered fire, from ample evidence at sites in Asia. There is no reason to attribute mastery of fire to Homo ergaster, the descendant species of Homo habilis that remained in Africa.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

(A) Before their migration, Homo erectus occupied African territory as far south as Tanzania.
(B) The strain of migration provided the selective pressure motivating Homo erectus' mastery of fire.
(C) Homo ergaster would not have derived as much benefit from the mastery of fire as did Homo erectus.
(D) Homo ergaster inherited all cultural knowledge from Homo habilis, a species that did not have mastery of fire.
(E) Homo ergaster did not occupy regions as far south as Tanzania until well after the time of these three sites.


[spoiler]OA: (A)[/spoiler]

For more practice questions, as well as a full discussion of this particular question, see this blog.
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2013/more-gmat- ... questions/

Mike :-)
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
https://gmat.magoosh.com/
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by Nitin.811g » Sat Aug 24, 2013 9:29 pm
IMO , it should be A since option provides a fact to the premise. If A is not correct, then the conclusion will not hold good.
Join the discussion

by pawan750 » Mon Jun 15, 2015 7:41 am
Mike@Magoosh wrote:Archaeologists have discovered three sites showing conclusive evidence for the mastery of fire in Tanzania, from a period slightly after the time that Homo habilis was present in Africa. These sites clearly were founded by Homo erectus, the descendant species of Homo habilis that migrated north, out of Africa and into Asia. Homo erectus was known to have mastered fire, from ample evidence at sites in Asia. There is no reason to attribute mastery of fire to Homo ergaster, the descendant species of Homo habilis that remained in Africa.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

(A) Before their migration, Homo erectus occupied African territory as far south as Tanzania.
(B) The strain of migration provided the selective pressure motivating Homo erectus' mastery of fire.
(C) Homo ergaster would not have derived as much benefit from the mastery of fire as did Homo erectus.
(D) Homo ergaster inherited all cultural knowledge from Homo habilis, a species that did not have mastery of fire.
(E) Homo ergaster did not occupy regions as far south as Tanzania until well after the time of these three sites.


[spoiler]OA: (A)[/spoiler]

For more practice questions, as well as a full discussion of this particular question, see this blog.
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2013/more-gmat- ... questions/

Mike :-)
Hi mike,

Could you please provide your approach on this. I looked on blogs also but all have provided negation test for all the options. This is time consuming. negation we can apply when we have only 2 options to save time.


Please clarify this one. Although I marked this one right but took 3.5 minutes to relate all facts in argument.

Thanks
Join the discussion

by Mike@Magoosh » Mon Jun 15, 2015 11:50 am
pawan750 wrote:Hi mike,

Could you please provide your approach on this. I looked on blogs also but all have provided negation test for all the options. This is time consuming. negation we can apply when we have only 2 options to save time.

Please clarify this one. Although I marked this one right but took 3.5 minutes to relate all facts in argument.

Thanks
Dear pawan750,
My friend, I'm happy to respond. :-) Here's what I'll say. I don't think it's a question of some "magic bullet" analysis that is quicker than the negation test. Instead, I think you need to increase you facility with English and with the analysis of arguments in English. I am going to recommend that you read for an hour a day every day: read business newspapers and periodicals, sources that are likely to contain complex real-world arguments. See:
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2014/how-to-imp ... bal-score/
For someone with facility with the analysis of arguments in English, running through the negation test for these five answer choices takes under a minute. That's the ideal for which you should be striving.
Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
https://gmat.magoosh.com/
Join the discussion