BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Arbor Day was founded in 1872 -Weaken

Expert replies
by patanjali.purpose » Sun Mar 04, 2012 6:52 am
Arbor Day was founded in 1872 to promote the planting and growth of trees in the US. Proponents of Arbor Day argue that the large-scale planting of trees would be beneficial for the environment. Trees reduce erosion, provide homes for animals, and draw harmful polluants out of the atmosphere. As a result, they advocate that land should be set aside to plant millions of acres of trees.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion drawn by the Arbor Day proponents above?

A) 2.6 million acres of trees are planted annually in the US, without any additional impetis needed

B) Studies have shown that large tree plantations can reduce stream flow, use large amounts of water, and consume essential nutrients in poor soils, leaving the soils salty and acidic

C) When Hurricane Katrina hit the Gulf Coast, it destroyed 320 million trees, resulting in over 424 million tons of Carbon dioxide being relesed into the atomosphere

D) Deforestation has been linked to decrased evapotranpiration, which lessens atomspheric moisture and decreases precipitation downwind from the deforested area

E) The US has the 7th highest rate of primary forest loss of any country in the world.

[spoiler]Veritas; OA-B; Pls explain reasoning for B & C.[/spoiler]
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by killer1387 » Sun Mar 04, 2012 8:05 am
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion drawn by the Arbor Day proponents above?

A) 2.6 million acres of trees are planted annually in the US, without any additional impetis needed
--> we dont know if this figure is large or small so irrelevant

B) Studies have shown that large tree plantations can reduce stream flow, use large amounts of water, and consume essential nutrients in poor soils, leaving the soils salty and acidic
--> Points out some demerits of tree plantation hence flows against the conclusion drawn.

C) When Hurricane Katrina hit the Gulf Coast, it destroyed 320 million trees, resulting in over 424 million tons of Carbon dioxide being relesed into the atomosphere
--> okay if the trees are destroyed then it would be gud to go with the conclusion hence this strengthens.

D) Deforestation has been linked to decrased evapotranpiration, which lessens atomspheric moisture and decreases precipitation downwind from the deforested area
--> somehow supports the conclusion, anyway argument doesnt deals with deforestation.

E) The US has the 7th highest rate of primary forest loss of any country in the world.
--> It supports

B is the best one.

HTH
Join the discussion

by GmatKiss » Mon Mar 05, 2012 3:02 am
What about A ?
Join the discussion

by killer1387 » Mon Mar 05, 2012 3:52 am
GmatKiss wrote:What about A ?
A doesnt affects the conclusion its just depends on our perception that the figure mentioned is high or low. So its just irrelevant.
Join the discussion