BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Approximately $120 billion in venture capital

Expert replies
by akhpad » Mon Mar 29, 2010 9:43 pm
Source: McGraw-Hill's GMAT By James Hasik, Stacey Rudnick, Ryan Hackney

Approximately $120 billion in venture capital is estimated as having poured into technology stocks during the late 1990s, creating a valuation bubble that burst in 2000.

A. Approximately $120 billion in venture capital is estimated as having poured into technology stocks during the late 1990s, creating
B. During the late 1990s approximately $120 billion in venture capital is estimated to have poured into technology stocks and created
C. During the late 1990s it is estimated that there was approximately $120 billion in venture capital that was poured into technology stocks, creating
D. It is estimated that during the late 1990s approximately $120 billion in venture capital poured into technology stocks, creating
E. It is estimated that there was approximately $120 billion in venture capital that poured into technology stocks during the late 1990s and created

ANSWER: D;
Answers B and C are incorrect because they imply that the estimation took place during the 1990s, not during the present. A is inferior to D because "estimated as having poured" is unidiomatic; E is inferior to D because it is less concise and because the ending of E could imply that the estimation refers to the creation of the bubble as well as to the $120 billion. D is the best answer.

Can someone explain more about it?
Last edited by akhpad on Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by rockeyb » Mon Mar 29, 2010 10:02 pm
Approximately $120 billion in venture capital is estimated as having poured into technology stocks during the late 1990s, creating a valuation bubble that burst in 2000.

The interesting thing about this sentence is the starting phrase . Its confusing as to who or what is creating the valuation bubble to burst .


A. Approximately $120 billion in venture capital is estimated as having poured into technology stocks during the late 1990s, creating
[The correct Idiom is Estimated TO BE and not Estimated AS , eliminate]
B. During the late 1990s approximately $120 billion in venture capital is estimated to have poured into technology stocks and created
[ During the late 1990s..............,is estimated, the estimation was done recently and the money was pored in to stocks in the past . The meaning is changed completely eliminate]
C. During the late 1990s it is estimated that there was approximately $120 billion in venture capital that was poured into technology stocks, creating
[THERE is normally used to refer to a place. In the above THERE lacks an antecedent, eliminate ]
D. It is estimated that during the late 1990s approximately $120 billion in venture capital poured into technology stocks, creating
[Correct CREATING = noun is modifying VALUATION ]
E. It is estimated that there was approximately $120 billion in venture capital that poured into technology stocks during the late 1990s and created
[Same error as in C is repeated in E , eliminate ]
"Know thyself" and "Nothing in excess"
Join the discussion

by akhpad » Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:43 pm
Thanks for reply.

Here, I could not understand the incorrect use of there?

Suppose, If I way - There is no money in my account. I believe it is correct.
Join the discussion

by rockeyb » Tue Apr 06, 2010 9:53 pm
akhp77 wrote:Thanks for reply.

Here, I could not understand the incorrect use of there?

Suppose, If I way - There is no money in my account. I believe it is correct.
You are right the sentence "There is no money in my account" - is correct .

Ex : There is a cat at the door step .

In option C and E the use of pronoun THERE is correct . But in fact we have other errors and C and E .

C - Dose the same mistake as B in suggesting that estimation took place in 1990 and not recently .

Where as in E .

It is estimated that there was approximately $120 billion in venture capital that poured into technology stocks during the late 1990s and created


THAT modifies the noun preceding it . In this case its " venture capital " and venture capital is not a living thing to pour some thing in to technology stocks .


Sorry for the confusion .
"Know thyself" and "Nothing in excess"
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1