Because an oversupply of computer chips has sent prices plunging, the manufacturer has announced that it will cut production by closing its factories for two days a month.
A. Because an oversupply of computer chips has sent prices plunging
B. Because of plunging prices for computer chips, which is due to an oversupply
C. Because computer chip prices have been sent plunging, which resulted from an oversupply
D. Due to plunging computer chip prices from an oversupply
E. Due to an oversupply, with the result that computer chip prices have been sent plunging
This was really tough for me , OA is given as : A
Can anyone comment what's wrong with[spoiler] D?[/spoiler]
Guess experts need to step in. IMHO, a controversial question. Is it really from the OG??? Even D has been cited as OA in the past
The fight is clearly between A and D
When "Due to" is used as "caused by", D makes grammatical sense but A sounds more logical to me because
A says that an "
Oversupply" in the market will force the company to shut down production for 2 days, while D says that
plunging prices will force the company to shut down production.
However, A has a "present perfect" problem. Clearly oversupply precedes manufacturer announcement, i don't think we can use 2 "has" here.
I will go with
A because it is marginally more logical