Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Approach to Critical Reasoning problems

Expert replies
by [email protected] » Tue Jul 14, 2015 9:16 pm
I have practised a lot of critical reasoning problems and i am able to solve over 80% of problems in CR correctly.

Recently i decided to take a few quizzes to test my level of preparation in CR.

I started with practicing Assumption type problems (the easy ones) initially.
In the intial quiz of around 10 questions,my accuracy was around 90%.

Then i jumped over to solving medium and difficult level. The CR arguments here were much bigger and had around 60-70 words. In these problems, my accuracy fell to around 25% (i attempted all the quizzes in a timed test format).
After the test, i wrote down all the problems, drew a logical structure on paper of the arguments and then was able to solve a big percentage of the tougher problems correctly.

I attempted a test with tough assumption problems again after some days. Some of the arguments that i got were too convoluted and i had a strong urge to put down the argument in a structure format on paper. But looking away from the screen even once in an attempt to write anything kills atleast 20-30 seconds plus also destroys the focus. I timed myself when i tried to create a logical structure for each tough problem on paper and then answered the question. I took 3.5 to 4 minutes to solve each of the problems. Though the accuracy has improved, i am killing too much time here.

Can yl suggest how to deal with this situation.
How do you guys approach the CR problems, especially the convoluted ones, which have many links with many assumptions which are not easy to figure out.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by MartyMurray » Fri Jul 17, 2015 10:31 pm
[email protected] wrote:How do you guys approach the CR problems, especially the convoluted ones, which have many links with many assumptions which are not easy to figure out.
Generally I seek to understand what is going on in the argument by reading the prompt, maybe multiple times.

I am not really rule or strategy driven and mostly what I seek to get from the prompt are a general idea of what's going on in the argument and the conclusion of the argument.

Sometimes, the prompt is fairly complicated and it's not clear what will be needed for answering the question. In that case, reading and analyzing the prompt until I see the purpose of every part seems like a waste of time. So rather than do that, I go to the question and the answer choices to see what I am up against.

From there the process is dynamic. If in reading the question and answer choices I find that I need to further analyze the prompt, which is often the case with boldfaced questions, then I do. Otherwise I just use what I have to use to get the answer.

To me the conclusion is the key part of the argument, and usually what is going on in the arguments seems pretty clear. I don't often distract myself by worrying about every assumption or premise. I just seek to get the gist of the argument and to see how the answer choices work with that.

I am not sure if this helps you, but I am thinking that maybe if you seek to see a picture of what's being described and seek to handle the situations more as you would real life decisions rather than getting caught up in details or GMAT ish ways of doing things, you will see the arguments more clearly and get the CR questions right without having to do so much work.
Marty Murray
Perfect Scoring Tutor With Over a Decade of Experience
MartyMurrayCoaching.com
Contact me at [email protected] for a free consultation.
Join the discussion