BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 28
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

15 live classes from Sep 28, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

approach other then picking numbers?

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by mim3 » Fri Jul 11, 2008 12:05 pm
Well... I think that picking numbers is the best way to rule out both statements by themselves. I always pick very large/extreme numbers in ineqalities to disprove/rule out the statments. Once you know that you're working with the combined statements, you can match up the inequalities and get:

x-y > -2
x-2y< -6

which becomes:
x - y > -2
-x + 2y > 6

Combined:
y>4

Knowing that we also know that x has to be positive and get the answer.
Join the discussion

by ildude02 » Fri Jul 11, 2008 12:19 pm
So we can combine the inequalities from statement 1 and statement 2 without any issues? Since doing so madeit eeasier to figure out that y MUST be a value greater then 4.

Are there any exception as to when you cannot just combine the inequalites from 1 and 2 ?
Join the discussion