BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

any thought!!!

Expert replies
by nafiul9090 » Fri Jun 08, 2012 5:38 pm
Since 1966, roughly 21 percent of those enlisted in the USMC had reached
an E-5 ranking in fewer than three years
.

(A) had reached an E-5 ranking in fewer than three years
(B) have reached an E-5 ranking in less than three years
(C) have reached an E-5 ranking in under three years
(D) had reached an E-5 ranking in less than three years
(E) have reached an E-5 ranking in fewer than three years

guys any thought ??
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by Birottam Dutta » Fri Jun 08, 2012 7:49 pm
Here, what we mainly need to choose is the had/have and the less/fewer than part.

Coming to the original sentence, the sentence starts off with "Since 1966,..." this implies that it is an ongoing activity from 1966 to present. So, here we need to choose have and not had. Had implies only past tense whereas have suggests that from past to current, so we choose have.

So, A and D are eliminated.

Now, come to less than fewer than.

Fewer than is used for countable nouns which have plurals such as dogs, newspapers, umbrellas, men,etc. For example, there are fewer boys present today, than there were yesterday.

Less is used for uncountable nouns or does not have a plural such time, rain, money, Air, water etc.

Example: I have less money now than I had a month back.

Less is also used when a Number is on its own and associated with its unit of measurement.

Example: Thier marriage lasted less than two years.

Now one thing to note here is that "I have fewer than two dollars" is not correct but "I have less than two dollars" is correct, as dollars is the unit of measurement and two is the quantity.

Using this logic, in the above sentence, less than three years is the correct version.

So, the correct choice is B!
Join the discussion

by ananyaray9 » Sat Jun 09, 2012 8:01 am
thank u...it was a good explanation...
Join the discussion

by ankita1709 » Sat Jun 09, 2012 7:46 pm
basically when comparison between quantities involving units is involved less than is used even if it is a countable noun
Ankita
Join the discussion

by 1947 » Sat Jun 09, 2012 10:02 pm
nafiul9090 wrote:Since 1966, roughly 21 percent of those enlisted in the USMC had reached
an E-5 ranking in fewer than three years
.

(A) had reached an E-5 ranking in fewer than three years
(B) have reached an E-5 ranking in less than three years
(C) have reached an E-5 ranking in under three years
(D) had reached an E-5 ranking in less than three years
(E) have reached an E-5 ranking in fewer than three years

guys any thought ??
since points that have is needed not had so B,C,E remain...out of these I will choose B....not sure why ?
If my post helped you- let me know by pushing the thanks button. Thanks
Join the discussion

by dhonu121 » Sun Jun 10, 2012 5:10 am
As per me, correct answer is E.
Not sure why Birottam beleives that less should be used instead of fewer.
Here three years is surely a countable entity and thus the use of fewer is justified.
In case of dollars, we say I have less than 3 dollars because saying
I have fewer than 3 dollars would indicate saying that I have literally fewer that 3, 1 dollar bills.
But here fewer than 3 years seems correct.
If you've liked my post, let me know by pressing the thanks button.
Join the discussion

by avik.ch » Sun Jun 10, 2012 8:11 pm
nafiul9090 wrote:Since 1966, roughly 21 percent of those enlisted in the USMC had reached
an E-5 ranking in fewer than three years
.

(A) had reached an E-5 ranking in fewer than three years
(B) have reached an E-5 ranking in less than three years
(C) have reached an E-5 ranking in under three years
(D) had reached an E-5 ranking in less than three years
(E) have reached an E-5 ranking in fewer than three years

guys any thought ??
less : it can act as an adjective ( noun modifier), adverb( verb modifier ) and as a noun
lower/fewer : always act as an adjective

"in" being a preposition is always followed by a noun - Only B and D stands out.

Since X,....- present perfect tense should be used and not past perfect. "Since 1966" is an adverb of time for an events started in the past and still continuing.

Hope this helps !!
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Mon Jun 11, 2012 1:03 am
Birottam Dutta!!! what he said is absolutely correct. The reason is that in choosing between the
countable and uncountable nouns, there are 4 exceptions, namely:
1. Time 2. Distance 3. Speed and 4. amount or money

This thing actually is given in the spidey's notes and the sahil's notes.

Kindly refer to them.

By the way thanks Birottam...
IT IS TIME TO BEAT THE GMAT

LEARNING, APPLICATION AND TIMING IS THE FACT OF GMAT AND LIFE AS WELL... KEEP PLAYING!!!

Whenever you feel that my post really helped you to learn something new, please press on the 'THANK' button.
Join the discussion

by dhonu121 » Mon Jun 11, 2012 1:22 am
Thanks for the reply.
Yes, there is more to it.
We use less/more with following countable quantities.
1.Time 2.Money and 3.Distance.
Confirmed here by Knewton https://www.beatthegmat.com/an-odd-st-t70077.html
If you've liked my post, let me know by pressing the thanks button.
Join the discussion

by avik.ch » Mon Jun 11, 2012 11:08 pm
I do not think there is any point in looking at the countable and uncountable quantities here. This difference comes only when "less" and "fewer" both acts as an adjective.

Here, "less" is clearly taking the noun slot - the object of the preposition and so "fewer" cant be used.

Considering some good example stated above :

I have less money now than I had a month back. - since "less" is an adjective. here the concept of countable and uncountable will come.

But, in this example

Their marriage lasted less than two years.

here "less than two year" is an adverb of time and hence "less" should be used and not "fewer".


Hope this helps !!
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1