BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Any simpler way to solve this !!!!

Expert replies
by kaulnikhil » Sun Aug 23, 2009 10:23 am
If x and y are non-zero integers and |x| + |y| = 32, what is xy?

(1) -4x - 12y = 0

(2) |x| - |y| = 16

[spoiler]i took each combination of x and y
x+y = 32
-x -y = 32
x-y =32
-x+ y =32
only one of them satisfies the equation so ans is A
is there any way other way to solve this [/spoiler].
the orginal solution is as follows ..
(1) SUFFICIENT: Statement (1) can be rephrased as follows:

-4x - 12y = 0
-4x = 12y
x = -3y

If x and y are non-zero integers, we can deduce that they must have opposite signs: one positive, and the other negative. Therefore, this last equation could be rephrased as

|x| = 3|y| how can we say this ?????
doesnt this mean 1 x...=3y
2...x = -3y
3...-x =3y
4.. - x = -3y
how can we put x = -3y as |x| = 3|y|???
we cant be sure about the other three


We don't know whether x or y is negative, but we do know that they have the opposite signs. Converting both variables to absolute value cancels the negative sign in the expression x = -3y.

We are left with two equations and two unknowns, where the unknowns are |x| and |y|:

|x| + |y| = 32
|x| - 3|y| = 0

Subtracting the second equation from the first yields

4|y| = 32
|y| = 8

Substituting 8 for |y| in the original equation, we can easily determine that |x| = 24. Because we know that one of either x or y is negative and the other positive, xy must be the negative product of |x| and |y|, or -8(24) = -192.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by m&m » Sun Aug 23, 2009 12:18 pm
agree with the original solution as the best method though the description is a little long-wided.

if you take 1 - you can simplify to:

x=-3y

now we know that x and y will have opposite signs so by multiplying them we will have a negative number. We don't really care WHICH one is -ve and +ve just that their product will be -ve. Now you can substitute the above into the given equation to get:

|y| + |-3y| = 32
|y|+3|y| = 32
4|y| = 32
|y| = 8

now |x| = |-3y|

so |x| = 3|y| = 3*8 = 24

now we can multiply |x|*|y| and we know the sign is -ve from before

hope that didn't confuse things too much
Join the discussion

by shanrizvi » Sun Aug 23, 2009 12:26 pm
Well, this is how I did it. Remember: In DS questions, it is very important to know when to stop calculating! You have to foresee.

Question: What is xy?

Lets look at Statement 1.
-4x -12y = 0
=> x = -3y

This equation tells us that x and y have opposite signs. Regardless of which of the two (x and y) is positive/negative, xy will be negative so we can ignore that. The ratio x:y is 3:1. We know (from the question), that the sum of |x| and |y| is 32. Using the ratio and the sum, we can calculate -|x|*|y| which is equal to xy.

The moment you see that you have the ratio x:y, know that you don't need to know the signs and have the sum of |x| and |y|, you should know that Statement 1 is sufficient.

Statement 2: |x| - |y| = 16

|x| + |y| = 32 (given in the question)

The problem with this statement is that you have absolutely no information about the signs. The moment you see that, you should know that this statement is insufficient.

You can figure out that for the above pair of equations to hold, |x| = 24 and |y| = 8. However, either one of them could be negative or positive (i.e. xy could be negative OR positive). Hence, making it possible to calculate |xy| but not xy.

I solved the pair of equations for |x| and |y| manually.

You know that |x| and |y| should add up to 32 and their difference should be 16. So pick numbers accordingly.

|x| |y| |x|-|y|

30 2 30
26 6 20
24 8 16 (BINGO)
Join the discussion