BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Antipsychotic Drugs

Expert replies
by umaa » Mon Jul 20, 2009 4:33 pm
Antoine: The alarming fact is that among children aged 19 years and younger, the number taking antipsychotic medicines soared 73 percent in the last four years. That is greater than the increase in the number of adults taking antipsychotic medicines during the same period.

Lucy: But the use of antipsychotic drugs by adults is considered normal at the current rate of 11 adults per 1,000 taking the drugs. In contrast, the number of children on antipsychotic medication last year was 6.6 per 1,000 children.

Lucy’s argument relies on the assumption that ______.
A. normal levels of antipsychotic drug use are rarely exceeded.
B. the percentage of adults taking antipsychotic medication is always higher than the percentage of children on such medication.
C. the use of antipsychotic medication in children is no different from the use of such medications in adults.
D. Antoine is not consciously distorting the statistics he presents.
E. a rapid increase in the number of children taking antipsychotic drugs generates more fear of random violence by adolescents than does knowledge of the absolute number of children on such medications.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by Domnu » Mon Jul 20, 2009 5:27 pm
IMO, the answer should be E. Here's why:

[spoiler]A, B, C are out of scope (B is also a bit extreme). D isn't as assumption she makes... she presents raw facts, and nothing Antoine states can change them.[/spoiler]
Have you wondered how you could have found such a treasure? -T
Join the discussion

by madhur_ahuja » Mon Jul 20, 2009 5:37 pm
IMO C

The use of but in the Lucy response presents a contrast and C justifies that contrast.
Join the discussion

by scoobydooby » Mon Jul 20, 2009 11:11 pm
E for me as well.

A large % increase does not necessarily mean a large increase in numbers in ablsolute terms. E addresses this.
Join the discussion

by tohellandback » Tue Jul 21, 2009 12:31 am
IMO C,
both groups cannot be compared unless the use of antipsychotic medicines is similar in both groups.
E IMO is out of scope. fear of random violence>?????
The powers of two are bloody impolite!!
Join the discussion

by viju9162 » Tue Jul 21, 2009 1:47 am
The answer is C.

A large % increase does not necessarily mean a large increase in numbers in ablsolute terms. Where is the author mentioning about this in E ?
"Native of" is used for a individual while "Native to" is used for a large group
Join the discussion

by umaa » Tue Jul 21, 2009 6:53 am
OA is C
Join the discussion

by khanshainur » Sun May 15, 2016 11:21 pm
I will Go with option С in this case
Join the discussion