BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Anti-discrimination Legislation

Expert replies
by komal » Wed Feb 10, 2010 8:47 pm
Agencies studying discrimination in housing have experimentally proved that minority clients are often discouraged as prospective buyers of residential real estate and the antidiscrimination legislation of recent decades were only mitigating, rather than abolishing, inequity in housing practices.

(A) the antidiscrimination legislation of recent decades were only mitigating, rather than abolishing, inequity in housing practices

(B) in recent decades, the antidiscrimination legislation only mitigated, rather than abolishing, inequity in housing practices

(C) that antidiscrimination legislation of recent decades has only mitigated, rather than abolished, inequity in housing practices

(D) that, in recent decades, antidiscrimination legislation has only mitigated, rather than abolishing, housing practices' inequity

(E) that recent decades' antidiscrimination legislation only were mitigating, rather than abolishing, housing practices' inequity

OA C
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by thephoenix » Wed Feb 10, 2010 9:24 pm
komal wrote:Agencies studying discrimination in housing have experimentally proved that minority clients are often discouraged as prospective buyers of residential real estate and the antidiscrimination legislation of recent decades were only mitigating, rather than abolishing, inequity in housing practices.

that minority clients are often discouraged as prospective buyers of residential real estate needs to be llel with the other part after and

pattern of llelism is THAt sub( minority clients) verb phrase (are often discouraged) and THAT sub verb

now eliminate options
(A) the antidiscrimination legislation of recent decades were only mitigating, rather than abolishing, inequity in housing practices
does not starts with THAT


(B) in recent decades, the antidiscrimination legislation only mitigated, rather than abolishing, inequity in housing practices

does not starts with THAT



(C) that antidiscrimination legislation of recent decades has only mitigated, rather than abolished, inequity in housing practices
pattern followed correct


(D) that, in recent decades, antidiscrimination legislation has only mitigated, rather than abolishing, housing practices' inequity

mitigated, rather than abolishing.not llel


(E) that recent decades' antidiscrimination legislation only were mitigating, rather than abolishing, housing practices' inequity
possesive form changes meaning

C is correct
Join the discussion

by bhumika.k.shah » Wed Feb 10, 2010 9:32 pm
proved that ...and THAT required . to maintain parallelism.
So strike out A and B


Correct idiom is rather than which is observed in all the remaining choices.

But in the first half of the non - underlined sentence - discouraged is used. Hence to maintain parallelism , the verb in the underlined part of the sentence should also have a verb in the past tense. which is only there in option C - mitigated , abolised.

Hence C

Hope this helps :)

komal wrote:
Agencies studying discrimination in housing have experimentally proved that minority clients are often discouraged as prospective buyers of residential real estate and the antidiscrimination legislation of recent decades were only mitigating, rather than abolishing, inequity in housing practices.

(A) the antidiscrimination legislation of recent decades were only mitigating, rather than abolishing, inequity in housing practices

(B) in recent decades, the antidiscrimination legislation only mitigated, rather than abolishing, inequity in housing practices

(C) that antidiscrimination legislation of recent decades has only mitigated, rather than abolished, inequity in housing practices

(D) that, in recent decades, antidiscrimination legislation has only mitigated, rather than abolishing, housing practices' inequity

(E) that recent decades' antidiscrimination legislation only were mitigating, rather than abolishing, housing practices' inequity

OA C
Join the discussion

by money9111 » Wed Feb 10, 2010 10:11 pm
i narrowed this one down to C & D... but only chose C because D seemed like it had too many comma's :-/
My goal is to make MBA applicants take onus over their process.

My story from Pre-MBA to Cornell MBA - New Post in Pre-MBA blog

Me featured on Poets & Quants

Free Book for MBA Applicants

Join the discussion

by Ludacrispat26 » Wed Feb 10, 2010 11:04 pm
money9111 wrote:i narrowed this one down to C & D... but only chose C because D seemed like it had too many comma's :-/
While it's nice that you got the answer correct, think process-oriented, not results-oriented. "Too many commas" will rarely to never be a reason to eliminate an answer. In fact, the GMAT does not test grammatical comma usage (mostly because it is an area of general confusion/contention). While D keeps parallelism with "that," it loses parallelism when going from "mitigated" to "abolishing," which is clearly wrong.
Don't stop believin'...
Join the discussion

by mgmt_gmat » Thu Feb 11, 2010 3:24 am
IMO (C) .. That pattern should be used here to indicate " discrimination.
Join the discussion

by money9111 » Fri Feb 12, 2010 6:03 pm
Ludacrispat26 i think i only chose D because it was "late" and while yes i saw the comma's i figured... yeah i don't feel like reading this right now... to be honest!
My goal is to make MBA applicants take onus over their process.

My story from Pre-MBA to Cornell MBA - New Post in Pre-MBA blog

Me featured on Poets & Quants

Free Book for MBA Applicants

Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1