I want to clarify whether a noun must be functioning as a subject or object of the verb in order to be qualified as an antecedent.
Thoughts?
Thoughts?
BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course
RedeemTarget Test Prep · GMAT
Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.
TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

with Chris Peckover

with Logan Thompson
Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.
Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.
Actually antecedent can be a noun that is functioning as a subj or obj of the verb. I want to know whether object of a preposition can qualify as an antecedent. Or any noun that is not functioning as an subj or obj of verb can function as antecedent?vaibhav.iit2002 wrote:Great question.
This ques. has been troubling me as well.
I have seen 1-2 examples where both subject and object noun works as antecedent but i am not sure and need more inputs
New here Create free account