BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

another good paradox question!!!

Expert replies
by [email protected] » Tue Jun 19, 2012 10:40 pm
Small community hospitals in poor urban areas almost always operate at a loss due to an unfortunate cycle of factors. High revenue specialists, such as surgeons, flock to hospitals that are more prestigious and can afford to pay higher salaries. Aware of this, local residents patronize the more affluent nearby hospitals when they need specialty care or forgo care entirely, while only utilizing the local hospital for low-margin routine care. Further, a significant majority of the community uses government health plans, which reimburse poorly for routine care, or lacks insurance entirely and cannot pay. The local hospital then loses money and cannot afford to hire specialists to conduct the higher-margin specialty care.

Which of the following, if it could be accomplished, would best help small community hospitals to break the pattern described above?

A] Negotiate higher reimbursement rates for specialty care with both government health plans and private insurers.

B] Advertise the hospital's specialty care services in the local community as well as nearby communities to attract more business.

C] Partner with a nearby affluent hospital to contract its specialists on a part-time, as-needed basis, which is more affordable than hiring these specialists full time.

D] Launch a community outreach campaign to educate the public about the low reimbursement rates of government health plans compared with the high rates paid by private insurers.

E] Negotiate with private insurers for higher reimbursement rates for routine care.



[spoiler]
The given OA is C.[/spoiler]



There are a series of questions lying or pending in this stimulus. In paradox questions you could add or consider the outside knowledge or out of scope answer choices.

Firstly, let us accept that the specialty care services are not a part of the small community services. That is one of the reasons for the losses in the business. On top of that, the low or less reimbursement rates of the government health plans is causing the patients to not get treated in these small community hospitals.
Then what is wrong with the options, A and E.

Could you please explain me the why those two options are wrong...

First priority is definitely given to option C, but why are these two options wrong.

I feel they are also correct or even they give a valid reason for the apparent paradox.
IT IS TIME TO BEAT THE GMAT

LEARNING, APPLICATION AND TIMING IS THE FACT OF GMAT AND LIFE AS WELL... KEEP PLAYING!!!

Whenever you feel that my post really helped you to learn something new, please press on the 'THANK' button.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by dhonu121 » Wed Jun 20, 2012 3:25 am
Even I was confused between options A and C and E.
A and E address one problem and C addresses another problem.
Now we have to devise a solution that breaks the vicious cycle. One method that C suggests would help in bringing local residents for speciality care, thereby generating high revenue for the hospital.
However, the other issue, the government one, remains there.
Now if the issue solved by C is good enough to compensate the loss by the second problem, then this problem is fixed. But we don't know that.

The method that A and E suggest, would help the hospital get out of the problem of losing money and they in turn may hire specialist to conduct higher-margin specialty care, thus solving the other problem as well.
Hence A and E score above C in terms of solving the problem if both A and E are achieved.
However, A and E are about negotiating which itself is unpredictable.
C on the other hand, is talking about partnering which is concrete and more dependable idea that just NEGOTATING.
Hence C.

This is the logic that I can think of in choosing C.
Experts might want to help here.
If you've liked my post, let me know by pressing the thanks button.
Join the discussion

by Birottam Dutta » Wed Jun 20, 2012 4:39 am
Let me give my humble thoughts on the question, it's an interesting one:

I think logically a hospital can only do C and not A and E. A hospital does not negotiate for higher reimbursements, etc. it can only check the paying capacity of the patients and treat those who can pay! Unless you are a government funded hospital, you will always incur losses if you treat people who cannot pay.

So, having said that, I feel that A and E are out of the jurisdiction of the hospitals.

However, C is a business decision that the hospital should take to brek the viscous cycle!!
Join the discussion