BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Another GMATPrep Question

Expert replies
by jaydeer44 » Fri May 09, 2008 2:47 pm
Can someone explain to me the best/easiest way to solve this problem? The Answer is E.


If Bob produces 36 or fewer items in a week, he is paid x dollars per item. If Bob produces more than 36 items in a week, he is paid x dollars per item for the first 36 items and 1.5 times that amount for each additional item. How many items did Bob produce last week?

(1) Last week Bob was paid a total of $480 for the items that he produced that week.

(2) This week Bob produced 2 items more than last week and was paid a total of $510 for the items that he produced this week.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by amitansu » Fri May 09, 2008 10:44 pm
In the q itself it says :

If I < OR = 36 then he's paid x dollar/item. (I is item here)

and if I > 36, then 36x+1.5xy (y being the additional item/s after first 36 items)

From 1 : 480 = 36x+1.5xy and 36x=480 (possibilities) or it could be any no. less than 36 * x =480 , so items are not definable.
Insufficient

From 2 : (y+2) =$510 y being the last week's items
again from q data we don't know how many items are produced !! Insufficient

Combining both also we have no idea that, how many items Bob produced.
The fact is that there an inequality data in q and there is no closing limit for it.So, basically not sufficient to fetch the no. of items, irrespective of any other data given in statement 1 and 2.

This is my understanding here.
Any better suggestion/s ; would be much appreciated !
Join the discussion

by VP_Tatiana » Sat May 10, 2008 1:35 pm
This is how I would approach this problem:

I look at (I) and I immediately see I have two unknowns: x, the pay per item, and y, the number of items produced. So, we can't solve for y.

I look at (II) and see the exact same issue.

Now we are down to C or E.

Even combining the information, I don't know whether y < 36. So, I don't know whether I should set up (I) like this:

36x + 1.5(y - 36) = 480

or like this:

xy = 480

I have the same issue with setting up (II). Since we have two possible equations for one side, and two possible equations for the other, we cannot determine a single value for y. Thus, the answer is E.

Hope that made it easier; ask if you have any questions.

Best wishes,

Tatiana
Tatiana Becker | GMAT Instructor | Veritas Prep
Join the discussion

by goelmohit2002 » Sun Aug 30, 2009 9:08 am
Hi VP,

Thanks.

why are we not considering the case#3...i.e. last week she made say 35 items...and this week she made 37...i.e. one over time and one normal case ?

Thanks
Mohit
Join the discussion