BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Annual Rent

Expert replies
by karthikpandian19 » Tue Nov 22, 2011 2:22 pm
The annual rent collected by a corporation from a certain building was x percent more in 1998 than in 1997 and y percent less in 1999 than in 1998. Was the annual rent collected by the corporation from the building more in 1999 than in 1997?

1. x>y
2. (xy/100)<(x-y)
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by kanwar86 » Tue Nov 22, 2011 2:26 pm
karthikpandian19 wrote:The annual rent collected by a corporation from a certain building was x percent more in 1998 than in 1997 and y percent less in 1999 than in 1998. Was the annual rent collected by the corporation from the building more in 1999 than in 1997?

1. x>y
2. (xy/100)<(x-y)
IMO, only statement 2 is sufficient. Hence, answer is B)
Regards

Kanwar

"In case my post helped, do care to thank. Happy learning :)"
Join the discussion

by user123321 » Tue Nov 22, 2011 2:44 pm
karthikpandian19 wrote:The annual rent collected by a corporation from a certain building was x percent more in 1998 than in 1997 and y percent less in 1999 than in 1998. Was the annual rent collected by the corporation from the building more in 1999 than in 1997?

1. x>y
2. (xy/100)<(x-y)
IMO B

user132321
Just started my preparation :D
Want to do it right the first time.
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Tue Nov 22, 2011 2:51 pm
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion