BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Animals with a certain behavioral

Expert replies
by UrFellow » Sat Sep 12, 2009 5:03 am
Animals with a certain behavioral disorder have unusually high levels of aluminum in their brain tissue. Since a silicon-based compound binds to aluminum and prevents it from affecting the brain tissue, animals can be cured to the disorder by being treated with the compound.
The argument is based on which one of the following assumptions?
(A) Animals with the disorder have unusually high but invariable levels of aluminum in their brain tissue.
(B) Aluminum is the cause of the disorder rather than merely an effect of it.
(C) Introducing the compound into the brain tissue has no side effects.
(D) The amount of the compound needed to neutralize the aluminum in an animal's brain tissue varies depending upon the species.
(E) Aluminum is never present in normal brain tissue.
OA:B IMO:C why is C wrong?
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by glorydefined » Sat Sep 12, 2009 7:15 am
Hi UrFellow,

I'd go with B too. The reason is as follows :

Conclusion : Affected Animals can be cured to the disorder by being treated with the Silicon based compound.

Premise : Because silicon-based compound binds to aluminium and prevents it from affecting the brain tissue.


(A) Animals with the disorder have unusually high but invariable levels of aluminum in their brain tissue. -- For an assumption this is not relevant

(B) Aluminum is the cause of the disorder rather than merely an effect of it. --- A good assumption as there could be sideeffects of aluminium in the brain which could be causing the behavioural disorder. But as this statement has ruled out that option and says that aluminium is the only factor which causes that disorder.

(C) Introducing the compound into the brain tissue has no side effects. ---well there could be no side effects but there is a hole big enough in this statement as this does not prove that the "disorder has occured due to aluminum ".I can fit my own assumption and say that aluminium is just present in the brains of animals with already behavioural disorder it would still be correct and will go against the arrived conclusion. So thats why this option is wrong

(D) The amount of the compound needed to neutralize the aluminum in an animal's brain tissue varies depending upon the species. -- we are bothered about animals as whole not a particular species. so purge it.

(E) Aluminum is never present in normal brain tissue.--its weakening the conclusion. purge this too.

Hope it helps :)
Join the discussion

by UrFellow » Sun Sep 13, 2009 7:27 pm
thank you very much! it helps a lot!
Join the discussion