Animals with a certain behavioral

This topic has expert replies
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 6
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 2:27 am

Animals with a certain behavioral

by UrFellow » Sat Sep 12, 2009 5:03 am
Animals with a certain behavioral disorder have unusually high levels of aluminum in their brain tissue. Since a silicon-based compound binds to aluminum and prevents it from affecting the brain tissue, animals can be cured to the disorder by being treated with the compound.
The argument is based on which one of the following assumptions?
(A) Animals with the disorder have unusually high but invariable levels of aluminum in their brain tissue.
(B) Aluminum is the cause of the disorder rather than merely an effect of it.
(C) Introducing the compound into the brain tissue has no side effects.
(D) The amount of the compound needed to neutralize the aluminum in an animal's brain tissue varies depending upon the species.
(E) Aluminum is never present in normal brain tissue.
OA:B IMO:C why is C wrong?

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 43
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 9:54 am
Thanked: 2 times

by glorydefined » Sat Sep 12, 2009 7:15 am
Hi UrFellow,

I'd go with B too. The reason is as follows :

Conclusion : Affected Animals can be cured to the disorder by being treated with the Silicon based compound.

Premise : Because silicon-based compound binds to aluminium and prevents it from affecting the brain tissue.


(A) Animals with the disorder have unusually high but invariable levels of aluminum in their brain tissue. -- For an assumption this is not relevant

(B) Aluminum is the cause of the disorder rather than merely an effect of it. --- A good assumption as there could be sideeffects of aluminium in the brain which could be causing the behavioural disorder. But as this statement has ruled out that option and says that aluminium is the only factor which causes that disorder.

(C) Introducing the compound into the brain tissue has no side effects. ---well there could be no side effects but there is a hole big enough in this statement as this does not prove that the "disorder has occured due to aluminum ".I can fit my own assumption and say that aluminium is just present in the brains of animals with already behavioural disorder it would still be correct and will go against the arrived conclusion. So thats why this option is wrong

(D) The amount of the compound needed to neutralize the aluminum in an animal's brain tissue varies depending upon the species. -- we are bothered about animals as whole not a particular species. so purge it.

(E) Aluminum is never present in normal brain tissue.--its weakening the conclusion. purge this too.

Hope it helps :)

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 6
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 2:27 am

by UrFellow » Sun Sep 13, 2009 7:27 pm
thank you very much! it helps a lot!