BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Anders: The physical structure of the brain plays an

Expert replies
by BTGmoderatorDC » Thu Jul 12, 2018 11:11 pm

Timer

00:00

Answers

A

B

C

D

E

Stats

Difficulty

Anders: The physical structure of the brain plays an important role in thinking. So researchers developing "thinking machines"-computers that can make decisions based on both common sense and factual knowledge-should closely model those machines on the structure of the brain.

Yang: Important does not mean essential. After all, no flying machine closely modeled on birds has worked; workable aircraft are structurally very different from birds. So thinking machines closely modeled on the brain are also likely to fail. In developing a workable thinking machine, researchers would therefore increase their chances of success if they focus on the brain's
function and simply ignore its physical structure.

In evaluating Yang's argument it would be most helpful to know whether

A. studies of the physical structure of birds provided information crucial to the development of workable aircraft

B. researchers currently working on thinking machines take all thinking to involve both common sense and factual knowledge

C. as much time has been spent trying to develop a workable thinking machine as had been spent in developing the first workable aircraft

D. researchers who specialize in the structure of the brain are among those who are trying to develop thinking machines

E. some flying machines that were not closely modeled on birds failed to work
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by deloitte247 » Thu Jul 19, 2018 11:58 pm
Option A - INCORRECT.
Yang's argument is based on the fact that physical structure alone can not be use to create an aircraft that will be functional as a flying bird.

Option B - CORRECT.
This option speaks more on the argument of yang. Yang's argument is being specific about the use of common sense and factual knowledge in creating a thinking machine presumed to be as functional as the human brain. However, involving only the common sense without the factual knowledge and vice-versa can be less effective in during and after production but when both work hand-in-hand then it is assumed to be effective and experimental.

Option C - INCORRECT.
Yang's argument is not based on the time dedicated in production but the effectiveness of the machine for the major purpose of which its produced.

Option D - INCORRECT.
The researchers who created the structure of the brain will also be involved in creating the thinking machine but yang's argument is the effectiveness of the thinking machine for its main purpose because physical structure alone can not define the function of the thinking machine.

Option E - INCORRECT.
Flying machine that are modeled to flying birds failed to work effectively also those that are closely modeled to birds failed too.
Join the discussion