BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Analysis of an issue - Please note it

Expert replies
by kam_06 » Thu Mar 05, 2009 9:08 am
Some educators argue that children who demonstrate particular aptitude for learning when they are young should be placed in special programs where they are given the opportunity to advance more rapidly than they might in normal classes. Many child psychologists, however, have publicly stated they do not support special programs for gifted children. They claim that separating children by aptitude at an early age is unfair to those in the slower classes, some of whom might also thrive in a more challenging environment.

Which do you find more convincing, the argument of the educators or that of the child psychologists? Explain your point of view using relevant examples, based on your experience, observations, or readings.

Answer :

The issue of separating children with regard to their learning aptitudes has always been a controversial issue and has often opposed educators and psychologists. Separating children based on their learning capabilities will have, in my opinion, more negative results than positive advantages. Thus, I agree wholeheartedly with the psychologists’ view point and I will demonstrate with evidence in the following paragraphs.

First of all, although gathering the children together, who can easily learn, can have a beneficial aspect from a technical point of view, but it will present on the other hand a negative impact from a psychological standpoint. To have a well balance of mind, children must be placed in a multicultural and diverse community.

Secondly, the idea of isolating clever children from the others will have negative social aspects. Indeed, it will create exclusion. By intermingling different learning level children, this will develop the personalities of the children. Having a good technical knowledge does not necessarily imply success in life. For instance, Einstein, who is universally acknowledged to be the best physicist, was a child with learning difficulties.

Finally, having children with a diversity of learning levels will create emulation among children. In consequence, this situation will bolster the children with lower learning capabilities to improve themselves, abetting at the same time the children who learn fast to help other children. It will result in a situation with benefits to all.

In sum, although it could be profitable from a technical point of view to the children with high learning aptitude to be separated from the other children, it will however create major risks and drawbacks from psychological and social standpoints. Therefore, the drawbacks outweigh the positive aspect of separating children based on their learning levels. My recommendation will be to maintain a diversified environment where children with all learning aptitude levels can cohabit.
Join the discussion
Source: — GMAT Essays (AWA) |

• Page 1 of 1