The conclusion is "In general, people are not as concerned as they were a decade ago about regulating their intake of red meat and fatty cheeses."

My approach with the AWA is really simple. I write an intro paragraph, and then I write the concluding paragraph. I attempt to write 2-3 body paragraphs afterward. So for this prompt i would probably write an intro like this:

The author asserts that people are not as concerned about limiting their consumption of red meat as they were in years past. To support this claim s/he points to the owner of a steakhouse being milliionaries. I believe this argument is flawed because there are several factors that the author would have to account for in order to properly conclude that the success of the steakhouse is directly correlated with the public being less inclined to limit red meat intake. The author would need to disprove the possibility of other factors affecting the profitability of the steakhouse. For example, the author would have to illustrate that the steakhouse does not generate large revenues from drinks. Also, the author would need to prove that the health food stores prices are not more higher than the prices of the steakhouse.

Body paragraph one talking about how a bar could account for the steakhouse profits

Body paragraph two talking about the possible pricing differences between the healthy stores and the steak house. Use wholefoods being more expensive than Kroger as an example.

Conclusion, resteatment of the intro pargraph more or less.

thanks osirus gr8 help