BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Analysis of an Argument : Could you please rate it

Expert replies
by kam_06 » Mon Mar 09, 2009 2:22 am
Subject :
The following was used as part of an internet advertising company's appeal to businesses: "Furniture Depot employed our internet advertising company to help. Since then its sales increased by 10% over last year's totals. Furniture Depot's success demonstrates how using our internet services can increase your profitability."

Describe how well reasoned you find this argument. In the discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the argument's conclusion. You may also address possible changes in the argument that would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.


Answer :


This is about an internet advertising company which proposes its internet services for companies in order to help them to increase their profitability. Referring to the success of one company that used its internet services and for which the company sales have increased by 10% over the last year, the argument presented in this article is, on my standpoint, really weak and not convincing at all.

First of all, the internet advertising company does not emphasis the link between Furniture Depot sales increase and the use of the internet advertising. Indeed, the sales increase may also be the result of many other advertising ways such as television and newspapers advertising that the Furniture Depot also performed. Besides, it can also be related to a diversification of the products or more generally be the result of a more favorable economic context.

Secondly, even if we consider that the sales increase of Furniture Depot is due to the internet services, it does not necessarily imply that is will be the case for all kinds of product. Furniture Depot has probably products that match the need of people who usually use internet services to buy products. It may not be the case for other kinds of products if they address people who are not internet users like elderly people. Therefore, other companies will not necessarily fit in the internet advertising system.

Finally, a point really weak on this advertisement is that an increase of sales does not systematically mean an increase in the profits. Indeed, companies which would like to use internet advertising company will have to pay for their services. In addition, the internet advertising company would probably require a percentage on the sales that may consequently lower the profit even if the sales increase.

In conclusion, the argument is really weak and flaw by the fact there is no guaranties that by using the internet services company, the profits will increase. No clues on the impact of the internet service on the sales increase, neither on the conditions to use the internet service in term of costs are demonstrated. The argument of this article will certainly be strengthened if more statistics have been illustrated and more guaranties on the sales increase have been provided rather than illustrating the success of only one company.
Join the discussion
Source: — GMAT Essays (AWA) |

kam_06 wrote:Subject :
The following was used as part of an internet advertising company's appeal to businesses: "Furniture Depot employed our internet advertising company to help. Since then its sales increased by 10% over last year's totals. Furniture Depot's success demonstrates how using our internet services can increase your profitability."

Describe how well reasoned you find this argument. In the discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the argument's conclusion. You may also address possible changes in the argument that would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.


Answer :


The argument essay is about an internet advertising company which proposes its internet services for companies in order to help them to increase their profitability. The argument presented in this article to attract new customers is, from my standpoint, really weak and not convincing at all.

First of all, the internet advertising company does not emphazis the link between Furniture Depot sales increase and the use of the internet advertising. Indeed, the sales increase could also be the result of many other advertising campaigns such as television and newspaper. Besides, it can also be related to a diversification of products or more generally be the result of a more favorable economic context.

Secondly, even if we consider that the sales increase of Furniture Depot is due to the internet services, it does not necessarily imply that is will be the case for all kinds of product. It is distinctly possible that Furniture Depot sells products that match the need of people who usually use internet services to buy products. Not every people buy products into internet, for instance elderly people. Therefore, it will not necessarily be appropriate for all types of company.

Finally, a point really weak in this advertisement is that an increase of sales does not systematically mean an increase in the profits. Indeed, companies which would like to use this internet advertising company will have to pay for their services. The outlay for this internet advertising will consequently lower the profits of the company even the sale increases.

In conclusion, the argument is flawed by the fact that there are no guaranties that by using the internet services company, the profits will increase. Likewise, neither the impact of the internet service on the sales increase nor the costs of the internet services are clearly described. The argument of this article would certainly be strengthened if more statistics had been illustrated and more guaranties on the sales increase had been provided rather than illustrating the success of only one company.
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1