BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

an old CR

Expert replies
by diebeatsthegmat » Tue Sep 21, 2010 1:28 am
A small marketing consortium wanted to get more young people to take up chess. Since chess is most enjoyable when two people of equal ability play one another, the group believed that few people play chess becauseit is so hard to finda suitable opponent.

Which of the following statements would most seriously undermine the consotium's viewpoint?

A. On average, a set of chess pieces costs much more than most other board games.
B. The chess industry received a lot of favourable publicity last year when a computer defeated the world chess chempion for the first time.
C. Tennis is most enjoyable when two equally mathed opponents play each other, and the number of young tennis players has risen steadily.
D. Playing chess help children develop analytical minds and learn to devise strategies to acheive long-term goals.
E. More than 50000 chess sets were sold last year.
_________________
[spoiler]hi guys, can you explain me why the correct answer is C
if we have to weaken the consortium view, it means we have to weaken the view that few people play chess because they cant find suitable co player.
if we choose C, does it not mean that we support that opinion? i dont understand, C says the number of young tennis players has risen steadily because they can find suitable opponent....
dunno why i am not as good at CR as i was before... i read a CR and i understand it but i always choose wrong answer and the situation happened the same when i resolve old CRs which i have read and done before.... hmhm how sad! [/spoiler]
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by pradeepkaushal9518 » Tue Sep 21, 2010 1:49 am
C is correct

as chess is enjoyable when 2 strong players play
consortium says as people dont find their strong opponent means people interested in playing chess will reduce.

now come to C

tennis is most enjoyable when two equally mathed opponents play each other.
if the consortium's view is true then number of people interested in playing tennis should reduce, but it says the number of young tennis players has risen steadily means consortium 's view is not correct means it it would most seriously undermined.

hope it clear now

A- out of scope
B- good but here champion and computer is involved not 2 human players
D-outcome of playing chess so it desnt related with view point
E-irrelevant

so left C
A SMALL TOWN GUY
Join the discussion

by goyalsau » Tue Sep 21, 2010 5:48 am
I able to get the C in less than a minute and then i suppose to pause the clock, i thought
How it is possible that i can solve a CR question in less than a minute and again i went to the question and spend half a minute more and thought A is right.
How smart i am... :lol:
Join the discussion

by diebeatsthegmat » Tue Sep 21, 2010 6:05 am
goyalsau wrote:I able to get the C in less than a minute and then i suppose to pause the clock, i thought
How it is possible that i can solve a CR question in less than a minute and again i went to the question and spend half a minute more and thought A is right.
How smart i am... :lol:

yeah you are stunning! lol
Join the discussion