Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

an CR from Gmatclub

Expert replies
by diebeatsthegmat » Wed Oct 27, 2010 11:30 pm
Brain scans of people exposed to certain neurotoxins reveal brain damage identical to that found in people suffering from Parkinson’s disease. This fact shows not only that these neurotoxins cause this type of brain damage, but also that the brain damage itself causes Parkinson’s disease. Thus brain scans can be used to determine who is likely to develop Parkinson’s disease.

The argument contains which one of the following reasoning errors?
(A) It fails to establish that other methods that can be used to diagnose Parkinson’s disease are less accurate than brain scans.
(B) It overestimates the importance of early diagnosis in determining appropriate treatments for people suffering from Parkinson’s disease.
(C) It mistakes a correlation between the type of brain damage described and Parkinson’s disease for a causal relation between the two.
(D) It assumes that people would want to know as early as possible whether they were likely to develop Parkinson’s disease.
(E) It neglects to specify how the information provided by brain scans could be used either in treating Parkinson’s disease or in monitoring the progression of the disease.

[spoiler]hi, guysm can you please explain me why the answer is B and not C? i chose C and the website i watched this question said the answer is B... B says about treatment while i think treatment is out of scope. the CR all says about the cause of P... so if its B the answer, i dont understand....[/spoiler]
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by yuliawati » Wed Oct 27, 2010 11:47 pm
This is one of 1000 CR questions.

I also picked C. I dont understand why the OA is B.
The conclusion is "brain scan CAN be used to determine who is likely to develop parkinson disease". So, I think B is out of scope.

Need the explanation from the expert T_T
Join the discussion

by Testluv » Thu Oct 28, 2010 2:13 am
Choice C is definitely correct. There are two flaws in this argument: a) the author assumes that the because (certain) neurotoxin exposure and Parkinson's results in the same type of brain damage that these neurotoxins cause the type of brain damage characteristic of Parkinson's (when it could be that something else causes that type of brain damage in people suffering from Parkinson's; and b) he also assumes that the correlation between brain damage and Parkinson's means there is a causal relation between the two (when in fact they can both be the result of some third factor).

Choice B is irrelevant. The author argues that brain scans can be used to predict who will get Parkinson's. While this would be an early diagnosis, the importance of early diagnosis is outside the scope. And, clearly, "treatments" are outside the scope.
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto
Join the discussion

by diebeatsthegmat » Thu Oct 28, 2010 11:12 am
Testluv wrote:Choice C is definitely correct. There are two flaws in this argument: a) the author assumes that the because (certain) neurotoxin exposure and Parkinson's results in the same type of brain damage that these neurotoxins cause the type of brain damage characteristic of Parkinson's (when it could be that something else causes that type of brain damage in people suffering from Parkinson's; and b) he also assumes that the correlation between brain damage and Parkinson's means there is a causal relation between the two (when in fact they can both be the result of some third factor).

Choice B is irrelevant. The author argues that brain scans can be used to predict who will get Parkinson's. While this would be an early diagnosis, the importance of early diagnosis is outside the scope. And, clearly, "treatments" are outside the scope.
yes, i also think B is irrelevant... thank you a lot, testluv
Join the discussion