BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

ambiguity....kaplan

Expert replies
by resilient » Thu Apr 03, 2008 8:18 pm
The legal considerations that have forced some universities to revise their affirmative action admissions programs are similar to the revisions that certain large businesses have recently made to their affirmative action hiring practices.

a
b. the affirmative action hiring practices that certain large business recently have revised
c.those that have recently forced certain large businesses to revise their affirmative action hiring practices.
d.those recent revisions that have been made by certain large businesses to their affirmative action hiring practices
e. what certain large businesses have done to their affirmative action hiring practices in th recent past.

qa is C. however doesn't the word THEIR in C cause ambiguity? Cant it refer to considerations ,universities or programs?

I usually have problems with the manhattan gmat DEADLY FOUR. Can someone help me nail this concept down.
Appetite for 700 and I scraped my plate!
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by ikant » Thu Apr 03, 2008 10:47 pm
Well in this case it is a simple case of comparing an orange to an orange.

We need to ciompare the legal considerations that affected the universities to the legal considerations that affected the businesses.

Hence look for options that have this scheme.

Only C does this.
"To do is to be"
Join the discussion

but

by resilient » Thu Apr 03, 2008 10:49 pm
but by definition, I can argue this both ways!
Appetite for 700 and I scraped my plate!
Join the discussion

by ikant » Thu Apr 03, 2008 11:09 pm
Well man... You can but look at the part that you are allowed to change. So you alreday have the first part fixed with "legal considerations" as the subject.

So you don't have a choice but to choos the same in this part.
"To do is to be"
Join the discussion

by xeqtr » Sat Apr 05, 2008 12:05 am
In this case I think no, since their is just used after businesses, there is no better way to refer their back to businesses imo.
however doesn't the word THEIR in C cause ambiguity? Cant it refer to considerations ,universities or programs?
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1