BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 559 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Allright.. Are these people morons or am I missing something

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 31
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2008 9:02 pm
Thanked: 1 times
by tzink » Fri Jul 25, 2008 8:32 pm
The problem displays -2, -1, 0, 1, 2 on a number line.

Of the five numbers on the number line above, which has the greatest absolute value?

I think i'ts pretty clear that -2 and 2 have the same absolute value, yet the OA is -2 because "the absolute value of a number x is the distance between x and 0 on the number line. -2 is the farthest from 0 and thus has the greatest absolute value."

HUH??

Is this just a mistake? It's from OG.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Problem Solving |
Legendary Member
Posts: 829
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 10:09 pmFollowed by: 3 members
Location: INDIA
Thanked: 84 times

by sudhir3127 » Fri Jul 25, 2008 8:37 pm
i would say My answer is also -2.

please refer to the diagram... its referencing between 1 and 2 and not exactly on 2.. thats the trap...

hence the answer is -2.

hope its clear now.. u shud have posted the picture as well..
Attachments
pic.gif
Last edited by sudhir3127 on Fri Jul 25, 2008 9:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 31
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2008 9:02 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by tzink » Fri Jul 25, 2008 8:48 pm
not really clear, no. absolute value is always positive, regardless of whether the number is - or +.
so the absolute value for 2 and -2 is 2
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 829
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 10:09 pmFollowed by: 3 members
Location: INDIA
Thanked: 84 times

by sudhir3127 » Fri Jul 25, 2008 9:01 pm
Hope its clear now...
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 31
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2008 9:02 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by tzink » Fri Jul 25, 2008 9:22 pm
well, on your diagram, yes, i can see that.
on my diagram however (in the OG book), the arrows are clearly directly over each number, not slightly offset like in yours.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 829
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 10:09 pmFollowed by: 3 members
Location: INDIA
Thanked: 84 times

by sudhir3127 » Fri Jul 25, 2008 9:31 pm
my OG is exactly the way the diagram is ..

i ask all the posters to pitch in and let us know what is their in their OG.. in my OG its question no 19. in some its 20 ...
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 31
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2008 9:02 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by tzink » Fri Jul 25, 2008 9:37 pm
yes, q # 19, but clearly pointing to the line, not offset. maybe a misprint?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2008 10:21 pm

by dheerah » Fri Jul 25, 2008 10:22 pm
tzink wrote:yes, q # 19, but clearly pointing to the line, not offset. maybe a misprint?
Hello friends,

I am using a 11th edition OG. This is the 20th question in OG. The lines are clearly offset in this edition. The arrow mark is directly above -2 and the other arrow mark is between 1 and 2. Hence the answer is -2.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2623
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 3:17 amFollowed by: 355 members
Location: Montreal
Thanked: 1090 times
GMAT Score:780

by Ian Stewart » Sat Jul 26, 2008 2:56 am
Yes, the question is misprinted in earlier versions of the 11th edition, then was fixed. I provided a link to the official corrections to the earlier versions and explained further here:

www.beatthegmat.com/errors-in-the-og-11 ... 14107.html
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 31
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2008 9:02 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by tzink » Sat Jul 26, 2008 6:40 am
Cool. Thanks for all your input.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1