BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Alligator

Expert replies
by jeevan.Gk » Mon Mar 02, 2009 11:47 pm
In the past year, there has been a dramatic increase in the number of people killed by alligators in Florida. During this same time, there has been an increase in the development of new houses, golf courses, and shopping areas in former wilderness areas within the state. Therefore, the increase in fatal alligator attacks must have been caused by the increase in the number of humans living in the alligator’s habitat.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously calls into question the explanation above?

a. Two years ago, a government initiative to reduce the alligator population size by destroying alligator eggs ended.

b. An increase in fatal alligator attacks tends to make people more cautious around lakes, ponds, swamps and canals.

c. The number of people killed by snake bites, spider bites and scorpion stings in Florida has held steady for many years.

d. Many of the new state residents have moved to newly constructed areas near water that is suitable for habitation by alligators.

e. The undeveloped areas of Florida have decreased in area by 5% in the past year.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by delhiboy1979 » Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:56 am
Option C, since if the reasoning given was correct there would have been an increase in deaths from other wil creatures as well (they too are part of the wilderness).
Join the discussion

by matterover » Tue Mar 03, 2009 1:21 am
A)
Effect:
Increased alligator attacks / population.
Cause
The reason attributed for increased attacks is increase in human population .
Weaken :
Find the alternate factors that can lead to same Effect.
Once we find that there can be multiple cause leading to same effect, the argument is weakend.
alternate Cause :
a ) What if the alligator population is itself breeding more due to some reasons
b) What if the initiative to kill the alligator eggs ended previously, hence those eggs are now hatched leading to increase in alligator population.
Hence the Answer A.
Join the discussion

by HouseBrand » Tue Mar 03, 2009 2:06 am
In my opinion it is C using PoE.

@matterover
A) This strenghten the arguement and does not weaken it. When the government does not destroy the eggs anymore, it is normal that the population of alligators will increase and that there might be more attacks.

What is OA. I'm still can't decide between B and C....
Join the discussion

by matterover » Tue Mar 03, 2009 4:08 am
You mentioned it right that if the eggs are not killed then it is natural for the population of alligators to increase.

Now, this increase in alligator population is leading to the more killings .

Let us say..initially -- 100 ppl 10 killings 1 alligator.
later -- 200 pppl 20 killings 1 alligator..
so more killings because of more ppl is what the arguement is aiming at..

Alternate Cause is..
initially --- 100 ppl 10 killings 1 alligator.
later -- 100 ppl, 50 killings 50 alligators.. --
Hence this calls the argument in question concerning increase in the human population. i.e not necessary that the maximum killings be attributed to the increase in human population, instead killings could be attributed to increase in alligator population ..
Join the discussion

Re: Alligator

by Musicolo » Tue Mar 03, 2009 5:28 am
jeevan.Gk wrote:In the past year, there has been a dramatic increase in the number of people k!IIed by alligators in Florida. During this same time, there has been an increase in the development of new houses, golf courses, and shopping areas in former wilderness areas within the state. Therefore, the increase in fatal alligator attacks must have been caused by the increase in the number of humans living in the alligator’s habitat.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously calls into question the explanation above?

a. Two years ago, a government initiative to reduce the alligator population size by destroying alligator eggs ended.

b. An increase in fatal alligator attacks tends to make people more cautious around lakes, ponds, swamps and canals.

c. The number of people k!IIed by snake bites, spider bites and scorpion stings in Florida has held steady for many years.

d. Many of the new state residents have moved to newly constructed areas near water that is suitable for habitation by alligators.

e. The undeveloped areas of Florida have decreased in area by 5% in the past year.
I think it is A and it does not weaken the argument as someone claimed. The argument is that because people moved to the alligators' area, the number of alligators attacks increased. The statement which weakens the argument is statement A. Because the government initiative to destroy alligators' eggs ended, this led to increase in number of alligators, hence, increase in number of attacks.
I honestly don't see how C could be answer since the snake bites, spider bites and scorpion stings are not mentioned anywhere.
I would also not consider B since does not call into question the original statement.
What is OA please?
Dino
Join the discussion

by bmlaud » Tue Mar 03, 2009 8:15 am
matterover wrote:A)
Effect:
Increased alligator attacks / population.
Cause
The reason attributed for increased attacks is increase in human population .
Weaken :
Find the alternate factors that can lead to same Effect.
Once we find that there can be multiple cause leading to same effect, the argument is weakend.
alternate Cause :
a ) What if the alligator population is itself breeding more due to some reasons
b) What if the initiative to kill the alligator eggs ended previously, hence those eggs are now hatched leading to increase in alligator population.
Hence the Answer A.
I agree, it should be A

Good catch Matterover
"Great works are performed not by strength but by perseverance."
Join the discussion

by iwant700plus » Tue Mar 03, 2009 8:36 am
I also get A. What's the OA?
Join the discussion

by quocbao » Tue Mar 03, 2009 8:47 am
I think it's A too
b. An increase in fatal alligator attacks tends to make people more cautious around lakes, ponds, swamps and canals.
People are moving to place near the alligator nest right ? If they are more cautious they won't move near by. So It could not be the answer.
c. The number of people k!IIed by snake bites, spider bites and scorpion stings in Florida has held steady for many years.
Not related, we're talking about death of alligator
d. Many of the new state residents have moved to newly constructed areas near water that is suitable for habitation by alligators.
It actually strengthen the topic when show the fact that more people move to alligators' habitation areas
e. The undeveloped areas of Florida have decreased in area by 5% in the past year.
Not related.


I hope i'm right :-P
Join the discussion

by welcome » Tue Mar 03, 2009 11:04 am
IMO E.
What is OA.
Shubham.
590 >> 630 >> 640 >> 610 >> 600 >> 640 >> 590 >> 640 >> 590 >> 590
Join the discussion

by hk » Tue Mar 03, 2009 1:41 pm
I would go with A..

Here is my reasoning. When the project for reducing the population ended people normally assume that the population of alligators is under control. So it calls in to question about the argument that the increase in fatal alligator attacks must have been caused by the increase in the number of humans living in the alligator’s habitat
Wanna know what I'm upto? Follow me on twitter: https://twitter.com/harikrish
Join the discussion

by Nailya » Tue Mar 03, 2009 6:20 pm
Its A! Alternative reason to cause same effect - killing by alligators.

C is irrelevant because the argument only talks about the increase in the number of humans living in the alligator’s habitat.

Otherwise it would be worth considering.
Join the discussion

by senthil » Tue Mar 03, 2009 7:07 pm
I will go for C . Wats the OA ????????????????
Thanks
Senthil

It seems impossible until its done.
Join the discussion

by jeevan.Gk » Wed Mar 04, 2009 9:35 am
Oa is A ..

Thank you guys
Join the discussion

by mason77 » Sat May 14, 2016 1:31 am
In my opinion A is the most logical one.
Join the discussion