Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Algebra Q

Expert replies
by madhan_dc » Sun Jan 30, 2011 11:02 am
Solve for x

1. 6> x+4 > 4

2. 2x > x+10 > -x

answer is 1. 0<x<2
2. x>10

Can someone explain to me how?

the way i went about doing this is

1. 6 > x+4 -4 > 0

therefore 6 > x >0

2. 2x > x+10 > -x

2x > x + x+ 10 > 0

2x > 2x + 10 > 0

and i didn't know where to go from here. Clearly i am missing something. Please help. Thanks.
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by Anurag@Gurome » Sun Jan 30, 2011 11:17 am
madhan_dc wrote:Solve for x

1. 6> x+4 > 4
2. 2x > x+10 > -x
Note that each inequality is composed of two inequalities.

1. 6 > (x + 4) > 4
=> (6 - 4) > (x + 4 - 4) > (4 - 4) ................ 4 is subtracted from each term
=> 2 > x > 0

In this case there were two inequalities, 6 > (x + 4) and (x + 4) > 4.

2. 2x > (x + 10) > -x
=> (2x - x) > (x + 10 - x) > -x - x
=> x > 10 > -2x
=> x > 10

In this case also there were two inequalities, 2x > (x + 10) and (x + 10) > -x
From the result x > 10 > -2x, we only took x > 10 as this ensures the other, i.e. -2x will be always less than 10 if x is greater than 10.

Hope it is clear now.
Anurag Mairal, Ph.D., MBA
GMAT Expert, Admissions and Career Guidance
Gurome, Inc.
1-800-566-4043 (USA)

Join Our Facebook Groups
GMAT with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/272466352793633/
Admissions with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/461459690536574/
Career Advising with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/360435787349781/
Join the discussion

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Sun Jan 30, 2011 11:32 am
madhan_dc wrote:Solve for x

1. 6> x+4 > 4

2. 2x > x+10 > -x
Hi,

when dealing with 3 part inequalities, here's the key rule to remember: whatever you do to one part, you must do to all 3 parts.

Since we're solving for x, we want to isolate x, i.e. strip the part of the inequality that contains x of everything except x itself.


1. 6> x+4 > 4

Here, to isolate x, we want to get rid of the "+4". To eliminate +4, we need to subtract 4 from that term. What we do to 1 term we must do to all 3 terms, so:

6 - 4 > x + 4 - 4 > 4 - 4

and

2 > x > 0

done!

2. 2x > x+10 > -x

This one is a bit more complicated, since there's no way to collect all of the Xs in the same part of the inequality. We can begin to simplify by adding x to each term:

2x + x > x + 10 + x > -x + x

3x > 2x + 10 > 0

Now, because we know that 3x > 0 (we can ignore the middle piece since the arrows all point in the same direction), we know that x > 0, i.e. x is positive. Since x is positive, 2x + 10 is greater than 0. Because the 2nd term is greater than the 3rd term, we can actually ignore that part of the inequality and just solve for:

3x > 2x + 10

Subtract 2x from both terms:

3x - 2x > 2x + 10 - 2x

x > 10

done!
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion

by madhan_dc » Sun Jan 30, 2011 5:25 pm
Thanks guys!
Join the discussion