BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Algebra Inequalities

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by cramya » Sun Mar 22, 2009 7:07 pm
Question:

If x+y+z>1 is z > 1

(or)

Is x+y < -1 then we know z > 1

Stmt I

z > x+y+1

z-1 > x+y

Therefore z-1+z > 0 (replace x+y in x+y+z>0 by z-1)

2z>1

z>1/2

INSUFF

Stmt II

x+y < -1

Exactly what we need

SUFF

Choose B
Join the discussion

by cramya » Sun Mar 22, 2009 7:13 pm
Or another approach pick values

Stmt I

x= -.3 y=-.3 z=.9 NO

x=1 y=2 z=1000 YES

INSUFF

Stmt II

x + y < -1

-1+z>0 (since x+y < -1)

z > 1



SUFF

B
Join the discussion

by BlindVision » Sun Mar 22, 2009 7:20 pm
You are right, OA = B.

Thanks Cramya! It makes more sense now :D
Join the discussion

by apple100 » Tue Mar 24, 2009 11:12 pm
cramya wrote:Question:

If x+y+z>1 is z > 1

(or)

Is x+y < -1 then we know z > 1

Stmt I

z > x+y+1

z-1 > x+y

Therefore z-1+z > 0 (replace x+y in x+y+z>0 by z-1)

2z>1

z>1/2

INSUFF

Stmt II

x+y < -1

Exactly what we need

SUFF

Choose B

How did you derive
"If x+y+z>1 is z > 1" from the question?
Join the discussion

by lunarpower » Wed Mar 25, 2009 12:51 am
apple100 wrote:
How did you derive
"If x+y+z>1 is z > 1" from the question?
hi - you must be a newcomer to the gmat scene.

ALL data sufficiency questions can be expressed in this format:

statement 1 can be understood and answered as "if (statement 1), then (question prompt)?"

statement 2 can be understood and answered as "if (statement 2), then (question prompt)?"

if necessary, the combination of the two statements can be understood and answered as "if (both statements together), then (question prompt)?"

in fact, considering these questions as though they literally contained these "if"s and "then"s can be an invaluable problem-solving aid.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Join the discussion

by lunarpower » Wed Mar 25, 2009 12:55 am
the most routine, and possibly most straightforward, way to answer this question is with the following standard fact about inequalities (note that the "alligator" is the "<" or ">" sign):

you can ADD inequalities if the alligators face the same way.

--

in statement (1), you know that
x + y + z > 0
and
z > x + y + 1

you can just add these together, giving x + y + 2z > x + y + 1. then cancel (i.e., subtract) the x and the y, giving 2z > 1, or z > 1/2. this is insufficient to answer the question of whether z is greater than 1.

--

in statement (2), you know that
x + y + z > 0
and
0 > x + y + 1 (i.e., the second statement, just written the other way so that the alligator is the same as the first one)

you can just add these together, giving x + y + z > x + y + 1. then cancel (i.e., subtract) the x and the y, giving z > 1.
sufficient.

ans (b)
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Join the discussion

by apple100 » Wed Mar 25, 2009 3:28 am
lunarpower wrote:the most routine, and possibly most straightforward, way to answer this question is with the following standard fact about inequalities (note that the "alligator" is the "<" or ">" sign):

you can ADD inequalities if the alligators face the same way.

--

in statement (1), you know that
x + y + z > 0
and
z > x + y + 1

you can just add these together, giving x + y + 2z > x + y + 1. then cancel (i.e., subtract) the x and the y, giving 2z > 1, or z > 1/2. this is insufficient to answer the question of whether z is greater than 1.

--

in statement (2), you know that
x + y + z > 0
and
0 > x + y + 1 (i.e., the second statement, just written the other way so that the alligator is the same as the first one)

you can just add these together, giving x + y + z > x + y + 1. then cancel (i.e., subtract) the x and the y, giving z > 1.
sufficient.

ans (b)
perfect, thanks!
Join the discussion