Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

airplane mechanical problems

Expert replies
by daretodream » Thu Feb 18, 2010 11:12 pm
Investigators concluded that human failure was not responsible for the fatal airplane crash last August, and since that time new and more stringent rules for identifying and reporting mechanical problems have been in effect. That accounts for the fact that reports of airplane mechanical problems have increased in frequency by 50 percent since last August.
Which one of the following is an assumption underlying the argument in the passage?
(A) Airplane travel is still relatively safe, despite the increase in reported mechanical problems.
(B) Mechanical problems in airplanes have increased dramatically since last August.
(C) Mechanical problems in airplanes have not increased by 50 percent since last August.
(D) Airlines are less reluctant to report mechanical problems than they previously were.
(E) Mechanical problems in airplanes have become easier to detect since last August.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by komal » Thu Feb 18, 2010 11:36 pm
daretodream wrote:Investigators concluded that human failure was not responsible for the fatal airplane crash last August, and since that time new and more stringent rules for identifying and reporting mechanical problems have been in effect. That accounts for the fact that reports of airplane mechanical problems have increased in frequency by 50 percent since last August.
Which one of the following is an assumption underlying the argument in the passage?

(A) Airplane travel is still relatively safe, despite the increase in reported mechanical problems.
Incorrect : This does not talk about the cause of increased mechanical problems. Eliminated.

(B) Mechanical problems in airplanes have increased dramatically since last August.
Incorrect : It weakens the argument by providing an alternate cause for the stated effect.

(C) Mechanical problems in airplanes have not increased by 50 percent since last August.
Correct : If it is not human error then it should be mechanical error and the number of mechanical problems should not be more than that present earlier.

(D) Airlines are less reluctant to report mechanical problems than they previously were.
Incorrect : How does it matter if airlines are less reluctant or more reluctant? Eliminated.

(E) Mechanical problems in airplanes have become easier to detect since last August.
Incorrect : Clearly out of scope
Last edited by komal on Fri Feb 19, 2010 12:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion

by thephoenix » Fri Feb 19, 2010 12:13 am
(A) Airplane travel is still relatively safe, despite the increase in reported mechanical problems
--> out of scope

(B) Mechanical problems in airplanes have increased dramatically since last August
--> this is a weaken

(C) Mechanical problems in airplanes have not increased by 50 percent since last August
-->best answer. You can use the Assumption negative technique in Bible critical Power score: Mechanical problems in airplanes have increased by 50 percent since last August--> this turns out to be a weaken to the argument, so this is the best choice

(D) Airlines are less reluctant to report mechanical problems than they previously were
--> this seems alright, but not as strong as (C). The reluctance is just a weak and abstract reason to decide whether to report a mechanical problem. But because the frequency increase dramatically, 50%, so the reluctance seems to play no significant role

(E) Mechanical problems in airplanes have become easier to detect since last August
--> weaken
Join the discussion

by mrinal2100 » Thu Feb 25, 2010 9:18 am
how does the option c weaken the argument if we take the negation approach..if Mechanical problems in airplanes have increased by 50 percent since last August ,then the reports of airplane mechanical problems should also increase in frequency by 50 percent since last August...
Join the discussion

by tallazndood » Thu Feb 25, 2010 10:13 pm
mrinal2100 wrote:how does the option c weaken the argument if we take the negation approach..if Mechanical problems in airplanes have increased by 50 percent since last August ,then the reports of airplane mechanical problems should also increase in frequency by 50 percent since last August...
IMO: There're two likely situations that are causing the increase:

1. More mechanical problems that are previously NOT reported are now reported as a result of the more stringent rules.
2. There has been an increase in the number of mechanical problems since last August.

Conclusion ties the increase of 50% to Situation 1. Hence, it must be assuming that Situation 2 is NOT the case. Therefore, C is the right answer because the assumption is eliminating an alternative cause. By negating option C, it weakens the argument because Situation 2 could also be the cause of the increase (or Situation 1 is NOT necessarily the cause).
Join the discussion

by Testluv » Thu Feb 25, 2010 10:31 pm
This is another explain the phenomenon argument. The author is advancing an "accounting" for why reports of mechanical problems have increased. And his explanation--his account--is that the new rules are more stringent.

In other words:

the phenomenon: increase in number of reports of mechanical problems.

the author's explanation (conclusion): new (and more stringent) rules.

In all "explain the pheomenon" arguments, the author is assuming that there are no other explanations.

Choice C matches this prediction although rather than saying "no other explanations", it is specifically ruling out a clear competing explanation--that mechanical problems have in fact increased. Using the denial test: if mechanical problems HAVE incrased, then that would be the explanation for the greater number of reports of mechanical problems--not the more stringent rules.

Because, in the absence of choice C, the argument falls apart, the argument's reasoning depends on choice C; choice C is a necessary assumtion of the argument.
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto
Join the discussion

by tanviet » Fri Mar 05, 2010 6:12 am
testluv, can I say that

in phenominon argumen

evidence is phenominon

coclusion is explanation

this is to quickly realize evidence and assumption.
Join the discussion

by Testluv » Fri Mar 05, 2010 12:04 pm
duongthang wrote:testluv, can I say that

in phenominon argumen

evidence is phenominon

coclusion is explanation

this is to quickly realize evidence and assumption.
yes, you can say that.
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto
Join the discussion

by joseph32 » Sun May 15, 2016 11:53 pm
I believe the answer should be C
Join the discussion