BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Air pollution

Expert replies
by phelps » Tue Jun 16, 2009 12:08 am
In 1986, the city of Los Diablos had 20 days on which air pollution reached unhealthful amounts and a smog alert was put into effect. In early 1987, new air pollution control measures were enacted, but the city had smog alerts on 31 days that year and on 39 days the following year. In 1989, however, the number of smog alerts in Los Diablos dropped to sixteen. The main air pollutants in Los Diablos are ozone and carbon monoxide, and since 1986 the levels of both have been monitored by gas spectrography.
Which of the following statements, assuming that each is true, would be LEAST helpful in explaining the air pollution levels in Los Diablos between 1986 and 1989?
(A) The 1987 air pollution control measures enacted in Los Diablos were put into effect in November of 1988.
(B) In December of 1988 a new and far more accurate gas spectrometer was invented.
(C) In February of 1989, the Pollution Control Board of Los Diablos revised the scale used to determine the amount of air pollution considered unhealthful.
(D) In 1988 the mayor of Los Diablos was found to have accepted large campaign donations from local industries and to have exempted those same industries from air pollution control measures.
(E) Excess ozone and carbon monoxide require a minimum of two years to break down naturally in the atmosphere above a given area.

Please expalin your answer as well
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Re: Air pollution

by Vemuri » Tue Jun 16, 2009 12:35 am
IMO D.

We need to find the explanation that least explains why the pollution levels came down in 1989.

(A) The 1987 air pollution control measures enacted in Los Diablos were put into effect in November of 1988.
A possible explanation. The pollution control measure put into effect in Nov 1988 has resulted in the reduction of pollution levels in 1989.
(B) In December of 1988 a new and far more accurate gas spectrometer was invented.
A possible explanation. The far more accurate gas spectrometer invented resulted in calculating the pollution levels properly in 1989. The inaccuracy in the reading for the previous years is a possible explanation.
(C) In February of 1989, the Pollution Control Board of Los Diablos revised the scale used to determine the amount of air pollution considered unhealthful.
A possible explanation. The revision might have been upward & so acceptable pollution levels were higher than previous years.
(D) In 1988 the mayor of Los Diablos was found to have accepted large campaign donations from local industries and to have exempted those same industries from air pollution control measures.
This cannot be a reason for the reduction in the pollution levels. The local industries were exempted from air pollution control measures. This does not explain the reason in the reduction of pollution. The exemption would actually encourage the industries to use the opportunity
(E) Excess ozone and carbon monoxide require a minimum of two years to break down naturally in the atmosphere above a given area.
This is a possible explanation.
Join the discussion

by phelps » Tue Jun 16, 2009 1:16 am
Original Answer B
Join the discussion

by Vemuri » Tue Jun 16, 2009 1:50 am
phelps wrote:Original Answer B
Aha...I understand. I made a mistake in reading B. It just says that a new and far more accurate gas spectrometer was invented. I read it as implemented. This surely is the least explainable answer choice.

Option D might explain why the pollution levels in 1988 actually went up.
Join the discussion

by vinaynp » Tue Jun 16, 2009 8:30 am
phelps wrote:Original Answer B
I fell for D as well :(
Join the discussion

by phelps » Tue Jun 16, 2009 9:32 am
go it...I fell for D as well
Join the discussion

by yeloaw » Tue Jun 16, 2009 12:37 pm
lol I made the same exact mistake and misread B. Chose D as well too
Join the discussion

by hetavdave » Tue Jun 16, 2009 9:16 pm
grrrrrrrrrr......I went for D too :))

Looks like we all are riding in the same boat. Invented/Implemented :)
Join the discussion

by Domnu » Fri Jun 19, 2009 6:22 am
Even if it said implemented, would B have an impact?
Have you wondered how you could have found such a treasure? -T
Join the discussion

by matanga » Fri Jul 10, 2009 11:27 am
One more person here that misread B and ignored it .......

Invented is not the same as implemented, so, if the gas spectrometer was invented, it wouldn't have had effect on the measurements.
Join the discussion

by Naruto » Fri Jul 10, 2009 7:57 pm
yeah but guys how would D in anyway would have been helpful in explaining the pollution trends?
Join the discussion

by james33 » Sun May 15, 2016 8:24 pm
The official answer is D. But I don't understand why? Can anyone explain
Join the discussion