BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Aid workers have worried that residents of the Eastern Gobi

Expert replies
by Mike@Magoosh » Mon Sep 30, 2013 12:30 pm
Aid workers have worried that residents of the Eastern Gobi Refugee Camp might be at risk for beriberi, a severe deficiency of Thiamine, a B vitamin. Thiamine is found in high concentrations in cereal grains, and many of the residents have grain free diets because of allergies. Doctors and nutritionists assigned to investigate the situation have disagreed, noting that the residents grow sustenance amounts of potatoes, kale, and cauliflower on the surrounding farm lands, and these foods provide substantial sources of Thiamine as well. Because the residents of this refugee camp do not have any allergies to any of these latter foods, and crops have been good because of favorable weather conditions, their risk of beriberi is much lower than originally thought.

In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

(A) The first is evidence in support of the conclusion of the argument; the second is that conclusion.
(B) The first is evidence that seems to contradict the conclusion of the argument; the second is that conclusion.
(C) The first is the conclusion of the argument; the second calls the conclusion of the argument into question.
(D) The first is the conclusion of the argument; the second is an alternate interpretation of this conclusion.
(E) The first is evidence in support of the conclusion of the argument; the second is evidence that contradicts the conclusion of the argument.


For a discussion of GMAT CR boldface structure questions, as well as the OA & solution to this particular question, see:
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2013/gmat-criti ... questions/

Mike :-)
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
https://gmat.magoosh.com/
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by rakeshd347 » Mon Sep 30, 2013 8:41 pm
Mike@Magoosh wrote:Aid workers have worried that residents of the Eastern Gobi Refugee Camp might be at risk for beriberi, a severe deficiency of Thiamine, a B vitamin. Thiamine is found in high concentrations in cereal grains, and many of the residents have grain free diets because of allergies. Doctors and nutritionists assigned to investigate the situation have disagreed, noting that the residents grow sustenance amounts of potatoes, kale, and cauliflower on the surrounding farm lands, and these foods provide substantial sources of Thiamine as well. Because the residents of this refugee camp do not have any allergies to any of these latter foods, and crops have been good because of favorable weather conditions, their risk of beriberi is much lower than originally thought.

In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

(A) The first is evidence in support of the conclusion of the argument; the second is that conclusion.
(B) The first is evidence that seems to contradict the conclusion of the argument; the second is that conclusion.
(C) The first is the conclusion of the argument; the second calls the conclusion of the argument into question.
(D) The first is the conclusion of the argument; the second is an alternate interpretation of this conclusion.
(E) The first is evidence in support of the conclusion of the argument; the second is evidence that contradicts the conclusion of the argument.


For a discussion of GMAT CR boldface structure questions, as well as the OA & solution to this particular question, see:
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2013/gmat-criti ... questions/

Mike :-)
I would go with B

First second boldface is definitely the conclusion of the argument. First bold face is the evidence, which suggests that risk of beriberi is much higher so basically it contradicts the conclusion.

A and E can be eliminated because first boldface doesn't support the conclusion.
C and D can be eliminated because first boldface is not the conclusion. If you do the "why" test C and D fails.
Join the discussion